Evaluation of two rapid immunochromatography tests for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins
- PMID: 17990108
- DOI: 10.1007/s10620-007-0072-2
Evaluation of two rapid immunochromatography tests for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of two rapid immunochromatography tests, the Tox A/B Quick Chek (TechLab) and the ImmunoCard Toxins A&B test (Meridian), in addition to the older Tox A/B ELISA, against PCR detection of the tcdB gene. Two hundred patient-unique stool specimens were tested. In comparison to the polymerase chain reaction results, the sensitivity and specificity of the two rapid tests were 94.7% and 97.2%, respectively; corresponding values for the ELISA were 93.6% and 94.3%. Findings on the rapid tests showed a 96% correlation with polymerase chain reaction assay and a 94% correlation with ELISA. Considering the importance of early and appropriate diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, rapid immunochromatography tests may be of great benefit to practitioners.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of three commercial methods for rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B from fecal specimens.J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Nov;46(11):3833-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01060-08. Epub 2008 Sep 10. J Clin Microbiol. 2008. PMID: 18784313 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of three rapid assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A and toxin B in stool specimens.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Feb;26(2):115-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-006-0251-7. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007. PMID: 17211606
-
Evaluation of a new immunochromatography test for rapid and simultaneous detection of Clostridium difficile antigen and toxins.Isr Med Assoc J. 2013 Jul;15(7):373-6. Isr Med Assoc J. 2013. PMID: 23943984
-
Is a two-step glutamate dehyrogenase antigen-cytotoxicity neutralization assay algorithm superior to the premier toxin A and B enzyme immunoassay for laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile?J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Apr;46(4):1523-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02100-07. Epub 2008 Feb 6. J Clin Microbiol. 2008. PMID: 18256226 Free PMC article.
-
Clostridium difficile testing algorithms: what is practical and feasible?Anaerobe. 2009 Dec;15(6):270-3. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Oct 22. Anaerobe. 2009. PMID: 19853666 Review.
Cited by
-
Clostridium difficile in patients with nosocomial diarrhea, Northwest of Iran.Health Promot Perspect. 2020 Mar 30;10(2):148-151. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2020.24. eCollection 2020. Health Promot Perspect. 2020. PMID: 32296628 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of clinical symptoms on interpretation of diagnostic assays for Clostridium difficile infections.J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Aug;49(8):2887-93. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00891-11. Epub 2011 Jun 22. J Clin Microbiol. 2011. PMID: 21697328 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013 Jul;26(3):604-30. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00016-13. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013. PMID: 23824374 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of repeat Clostridium difficile enzyme immunoassay testing.J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Nov;46(11):3686-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00931-08. Epub 2008 Sep 24. J Clin Microbiol. 2008. PMID: 18845820 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of three commercial methods for rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B from fecal specimens.J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Nov;46(11):3833-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01060-08. Epub 2008 Sep 10. J Clin Microbiol. 2008. PMID: 18784313 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources