Surgical treatment of the boxer's fracture: transverse pinning versus intramedullary pinning
- PMID: 17993437
- DOI: 10.1016/J.JHSE.2007.07.011
Surgical treatment of the boxer's fracture: transverse pinning versus intramedullary pinning
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical treatment of fractures of the little finger metacarpal neck, or "Boxer's" fractures, by transverse pinning and intramedullary pinning. Thirty-six patients with fracture of the neck of the fifth metacarpal were included in a prospective comparative randomised study. A palmar splint was applied for 1 week after both procedures. Patients began physiotherapy three times per week for 30 days. The patients were evaluated clinically six times after surgery, up to the 90th day, with X-ray assessment on days 8, 45 and 90. The study showed that intramedullary pinning gave better functional outcomes than transverse pinning, although the former was more technically demanding.
Comment in
-
Re: surgical treatment of the boxer.s fracture: transverse pinning versus intramedullary pinning, M. Winter, T. Balaguer, C. Bessiere, M. Carles, E. Lebreton. Journal of Hand Surgery, (2007); 32E: 709.713.J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008 Dec;33(6):818. doi: 10.1177/1753193408092818. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008. PMID: 19059988 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
