The impact of ethical beliefs on decisions about prenatal screening tests: searching for justification
- PMID: 17996350
- DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.10.010
The impact of ethical beliefs on decisions about prenatal screening tests: searching for justification
Abstract
Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome and other chromosomal anomalies has become common obstetrical practice. The purpose of this intervention is to provide women with the information needed to make informed reproductive choices. It is assumed that the ethical beliefs of parents play an important role in decision-making about whether to undergo testing, but little is known about their precise significance. More insight into how women conceptualize their choice of using prenatal screening tests may clarify the impact of personal ethical beliefs. With this aim, we conducted qualitative research consisting of semi-structured interviews with 59 women in the Netherlands who were offered a prenatal screening test. The analysis showed that the ethical views between acceptors and decliners showed similar diversity. In contrast with the currently accepted view, we conclude that ethical beliefs are one of the factors implicated in the decision. Women decide about prenatal testing by balancing the information provided by the test against the risks of further investigation, the emotional burden of a disabled child on their well-being and life perspective, as well as on those of family members. Normative moral principles are introduced once the choice is made, namely as factors in justifying and supporting the decision.
Similar articles
-
Women's views on the moral status of nature in the context of prenatal screening decisions.J Med Ethics. 2011 Aug;37(8):461-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040592. Epub 2011 Mar 23. J Med Ethics. 2011. PMID: 21429958
-
Reconsidering prenatal screening: an empirical-ethical approach to understand moral dilemmas as a question of personal preferences.J Med Ethics. 2009 Jul;35(7):410-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.026880. J Med Ethics. 2009. PMID: 19567688 Clinical Trial.
-
Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-making.Prenat Diagn. 2008 Feb;28(2):115-20. doi: 10.1002/pd.1920. Prenat Diagn. 2008. PMID: 18186151 Clinical Trial.
-
Ethnic differences in determinants of participation and non-participation in prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a theoretical framework.Prenat Diagn. 2007 Oct;27(10):938-50. doi: 10.1002/pd.1805. Prenat Diagn. 2007. PMID: 17597492 Review.
-
[Ethical aspects of prenatal screening for Down's syndrome].Orv Hetil. 2000 Oct 15;141(42):2293-8. Orv Hetil. 2000. PMID: 11076495 Review. Hungarian.
Cited by
-
Attitudes towards non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy among US adults of reproductive age.J Perinatol. 2014 Jun;34(6):429-34. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.30. Epub 2014 Mar 6. J Perinatol. 2014. PMID: 24603453 Free PMC article.
-
Information and decision support needs of parents considering amniocentesis: interviews with pregnant women and health professionals.Health Expect. 2010 Jun;13(2):125-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00544.x. Health Expect. 2010. PMID: 20536536 Free PMC article.
-
Providing recurrence risk counselling for parents after diagnosis of a serious genetic condition caused by an apparently de novo mutation in their child: a qualitative investigation of the PREGCARE strategy with UK clinical genetics practitioners.J Med Genet. 2023 Sep;60(9):925-931. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109183. Epub 2023 Mar 17. J Med Genet. 2023. PMID: 36931705 Free PMC article.
-
Decision making on antenatal screening results: A comparative Q-method study of women from two Chinese cities.Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):363-376. doi: 10.1111/hex.13178. Epub 2020 Dec 14. Health Expect. 2021. PMID: 33316122 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Influencing the Decision-Making Process for Undergoing Invasive Prenatal Testing.Cureus. 2024 Apr 23;16(4):e58803. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58803. eCollection 2024 Apr. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38654958 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical