Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of human MT+ reduces apparent motion perception
- PMID: 17997041
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.10.002
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of human MT+ reduces apparent motion perception
Abstract
We investigated the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the human cerebral cortex on apparent motion perception. Previous studies have shown that human extrastriate visual area MT+ (V5) processes not only real but also apparent motion. However, the functional relevance of MT+ on long-range apparent motion perception remains unclear. Here, we show direct evidence for the involvement of MT+ in apparent motion perception using rTMS, which is known to temporarily inhibit a localized region in the cerebral cortex. The results showed that apparent motion perception decreased after applying rTMS over MT+, but not after applying rTMS over the control region (inferior temporal gyrus). The decrease in performance caused by applying rTMS to MT+ suggests that MT+ is a causally responsible region for apparent motion perception, and thus, further supports the idea that MT+ plays a major role in the perception of motion.
Similar articles
-
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation alters optic flow perception.Neuroreport. 2007 Feb 12;18(3):229-33. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3280113977. Neuroreport. 2007. PMID: 17314662
-
The neural basis of the Enigma illusion: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov;49(13):3648-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.020. Epub 2011 Sep 19. Neuropsychologia. 2011. PMID: 21952193
-
Differential dependency on motion coherence in subregions of the human MT+ complex.Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Oct;28(8):1674-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06457.x. Eur J Neurosci. 2008. PMID: 18973585
-
Structure and function of visual area MT.Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:157-89. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131052. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005. PMID: 16022593 Review.
-
Extrastriate area V5 (MT) and its role in the processing of visual motion.Cesk Fysiol. 2004;53(1):17-22. Cesk Fysiol. 2004. PMID: 15702885 Review.
Cited by
-
Neural responses to apparent motion can be predicted by responses to non-moving stimuli.Neuroimage. 2020 Sep;218:116973. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116973. Epub 2020 May 25. Neuroimage. 2020. PMID: 32464291 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of attention on the asymmetric serial dependences between form and motion patterns and their computational processes.Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 9;16:1505031. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1505031. eCollection 2025. Front Psychol. 2025. PMID: 40271365 Free PMC article.
-
TMS over V5 disrupts motion prediction.Cereb Cortex. 2015 Apr;25(4):1052-9. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht297. Epub 2013 Oct 23. Cereb Cortex. 2015. PMID: 24152544 Free PMC article.
-
Serial dependencies between form orientation and motion direction are asymmetric.Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 7;14:1248307. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1248307. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37744576 Free PMC article.
-
Attention influences the effects of the previous form orientation on the current motion direction estimation.Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 16;14(1):1394. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52069-5. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38228771 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources