Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 May;29(3):396-409.
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Sep 26.

Design, feasibility, and acceptability of an intervention using personal digital assistant-based self-monitoring in managing type 2 diabetes

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Design, feasibility, and acceptability of an intervention using personal digital assistant-based self-monitoring in managing type 2 diabetes

Mary Ann Sevick et al. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 May.

Abstract

Background: The information processing demands associated with behavioral self-management of diabetes are extensive. Pairing personal digital assistant (PDA)-based self-monitoring with a behavioral self-management intervention may improve adherence and patient outcomes.

Methods: ENHANCE is a randomized controlled trial to test an intervention designed to improve regimen adherence in adults with type 2 diabetes. The intervention, based on Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), is paired with PDA-based self-monitoring. In this paper we describe the: (a) manner in which PDA-based self-monitoring is integrated within the SCT-based intervention, (b) feasibility and acceptability of PDA-based dietary self-monitoring, and (c) issues encountered in teaching participants to self-monitor using a PDA.

Results: During the first 30 months of this 5-year study, 232 participants were screened and 151 were randomized. To date, 6 cohorts have completed the study. The retention rate is 85% (n=129). Of those randomized to the intervention (n=74) and completing the study (n=61), 88% reported understanding the usefulness of PDA-monitoring, 85% reported ease in entering foods into the device, 70% reported ease in interpreting feedback graphs, and 82% indicated that they would continue to use the PDA for self-monitoring after the study concluded. Assuming 3 meals per day, participants entered an average of 58% of their meals in their PDA, and 43% were entered assuming 4 meals per day. If we eliminate from the analysis those individuals who entered less than 10% of their expected meals (n=12), the average rate of self-monitoring was 69% assuming 3 meals per day, and 52% assuming 4 meals per day.

Conclusions: PDA-based dietary monitoring is perceived by participants to be useful and acceptable. The approach used to instruct participants in use of the PDA and lessons learned are discussed. PDA technology shows promise as a tool for assisting those with type 2 diabetes in their efforts to manage their disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Consort Table
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The Balance Scale Page
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The Food Log Page
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The Nutrition Facts Page
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
The Graph Page

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus, Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:S4–S19. - PubMed
    1. National Institutes of Health. Diabetes Statistics in the United States. Bethesda, MD: 1999. Publication No. 99–3892.
    1. American Diabetes Association. Nutrition Recommendations and Interventions for Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:S48–S65. - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association. Nutrition recommendations and principles for people with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2000;24:S43–6. - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association. Evidence-Based Nutrition Principles and Recommendations for the Treatment and Prevention of Diabetes and Related Complications. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:S50–S60. - PubMed

Publication types