Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov;3(11):e197.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030197.

Gene family evolution across 12 Drosophila genomes

Affiliations

Gene family evolution across 12 Drosophila genomes

Matthew W Hahn et al. PLoS Genet. 2007 Nov.

Abstract

Comparison of whole genomes has revealed large and frequent changes in the size of gene families. These changes occur because of high rates of both gene gain (via duplication) and loss (via deletion or pseudogenization), as well as the evolution of entirely new genes. Here we use the genomes of 12 fully sequenced Drosophila species to study the gain and loss of genes at unprecedented resolution. We find large numbers of both gains and losses, with over 40% of all gene families differing in size among the Drosophila. Approximately 17 genes are estimated to be duplicated and fixed in a genome every million years, a rate on par with that previously found in both yeast and mammals. We find many instances of extreme expansions or contractions in the size of gene families, including the expansion of several sex- and spermatogenesis-related families in D. melanogaster that also evolve under positive selection at the nucleotide level. Newly evolved gene families in our dataset are associated with a class of testes-expressed genes known to have evolved de novo in a number of cases. Gene family comparisons also allow us to identify a number of annotated D. melanogaster genes that are unlikely to encode functional proteins, as well as to identify dozens of previously unannotated D. melanogaster genes with conserved homologs in the other Drosophila. Taken together, our results demonstrate that the apparent stasis in total gene number among species has masked rapid turnover in individual gene gain and loss. It is likely that this genomic revolving door has played a large role in shaping the morphological, physiological, and metabolic differences among species.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Gene Family Evolution in Drosophila
On each branch of the tree the number of gene gains/losses is given. The colors of the numbers denote the estimated rate of gene gain and loss. Numbers in boxes are identifiers for internal branches of the phylogeny.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Correlation between the Number of Gene Gains on Informative Branches of the Phylogeny Inferred from the Likelihood Method and from the Tree Reconciliation Method
Figure 3
Figure 3. Lineage-Specific and Extinct Gene Families
On each branch the number of lineage-specific families/extinct families are given. Numbers in boxes are identifiers for internal branches of the phylogeny.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 1997;278:631–637. - PubMed
    1. Rubin GM, Yandell MD, Wortman JR, Gabor Miklos GL, Nelson CR, et al. Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes. Science. 2000;287:2204–2215. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roelofs J, Van Haastert PJM. Genes lost during evolution. Nature. 2001;411:1013–1014. - PubMed
    1. Hughes AL, Friedman R. Shedding genomic ballast: extensive parallel loss of ancestral gene families in animals. J Mol Evol. 2004;59:827–833. - PubMed
    1. Aravind L, Watanabe H, Lipman DJ, Koonin EV. Lineage-specific loss and divergence of functionally linked genes in eukaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:11319–11324. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources