Spatial uncertainty explains exogenous and endogenous attentional cuing effects in visual signal detection
- PMID: 17997632
- DOI: 10.1167/7.13.4
Spatial uncertainty explains exogenous and endogenous attentional cuing effects in visual signal detection
Abstract
Attentional cues may increase the detectability of a stimulus by increasing its signal-to-noise ratio (signal enhancement) or by increasing the efficiency of the observer's decision making by reducing uncertainty about the location of the stimulus (uncertainty reduction). Although signal enhancement has typically been found in detection tasks only when stimuli are backwardly masked, some recent studies have reported signal enhancement with unmasked stimuli under conditions of spatial uncertainty (E. L. Cameron, J. C. Tai, & M. Carrasco, 2002; M. Carrasco, C. Penpeci-Talgar, & M. Eckstein, 2000). To test whether these increases in sensitivity in unmasked displays were due to signal enhancement or uncertainty reduction, observers judged the orientation of unmasked Gabor patch stimuli in the presence or absence of fiducial markers that indicated their position in the display. Consistent with an uncertainty reduction hypothesis, cues produced large increases in sensitivity when stimuli were not localized perceptually but produced little or no systematic increase when they were localized by fiducial markers. The same general pattern of results was obtained with cues designed to engage the exogenous and endogenous orienting systems. The data suggest that, in practiced observers, the cuing effect for detecting unmasked stimuli is mainly due to uncertainty reduction.
Similar articles
-
Attentional mechanisms in simple visual detection: a speed-accuracy trade-off analysis.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1329-45. doi: 10.1037/a0014255. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009. PMID: 19803640
-
Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays.Vision Res. 2004 Jun;44(12):1297-320. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.01.002. Vision Res. 2004. PMID: 15066392
-
Attentional control in visual signal detection: effects of abrupt-onset and no-onset stimuli.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Aug;38(4):1043-68. doi: 10.1037/a0026591. Epub 2011 Dec 26. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012. PMID: 22201464
-
An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection.Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;116(2):283-317. doi: 10.1037/a0015156. Psychol Rev. 2009. PMID: 19348543 Review.
-
Attention and luminance detection: effects of cues, masks, and pedestals.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Aug;26(4):1401-20. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.4.1401. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000. PMID: 10946722 Review.
Cited by
-
Visual attention in spatial cueing and visual search.J Vis. 2021 Mar 1;21(3):1. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.3.1. J Vis. 2021. PMID: 33646298 Free PMC article.
-
Reducing Spatial Uncertainty Through Attentional Cueing Improves Contrast Sensitivity in Regions of the Visual Field With Glaucomatous Defects.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Mar 23;7(2):8. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.2.8. eCollection 2018 Mar. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018. PMID: 29600116 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanisms of attention: Psychophysics, cognitive psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.Jpn J Psychon Sci. 2008 Jan 1;27(1):38-45. Jpn J Psychon Sci. 2008. PMID: 20523762 Free PMC article.
-
Involuntary attention enhances identification accuracy for unmasked low contrast letters using non-predictive peripheral cues.Vision Res. 2013 Aug 30;89:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Jul 18. Vision Res. 2013. PMID: 23872240 Free PMC article.
-
Eye movements and attention: the role of pre-saccadic shifts of attention in perception, memory and the control of saccades.Vision Res. 2012 Dec 1;74:40-60. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.06.017. Epub 2012 Jul 15. Vision Res. 2012. PMID: 22809798 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources