Modification of the convexity prior but not the light-from-above prior in visual search with shaded objects
- PMID: 17997638
- DOI: 10.1167/7.13.10
Modification of the convexity prior but not the light-from-above prior in visual search with shaded objects
Abstract
Studies of visual search performance with shaded stimuli, in which the target is rotated by 180 degrees relative to the distracters, typically demonstrate more efficient performance in stimuli with vertical compared to horizontal shading gradients. In addition, performance is usually better for vertically shaded stimuli with top-light (seen as convex) distracters compared to those with bottom-light (seen as concave) distracters. These findings have been cited as evidence for the use of the prior assumptions of overhead lighting and convexity in the interpretation of shaded stimuli and suggest that these priors affect preattentive processing. Here we attempt to modify these priors by providing observers with visual-haptic training in an environment inconsistent with their priors. Observers' performance was measured in a visual search task and a shape judgment task before and after training. Following training, we found a reduced asymmetry between visual search performance with convex and concave distracters, suggesting a modification of the convexity prior. However, although evidence of a change in the light-from-above prior was found in the shape judgment task, no change was found in the visual search task. We conclude that experience can modify the convexity prior at a preattentive stage in processing; however, our training did not modify the light-from-above prior that is measured via visual search.
Similar articles
-
A common light-prior for visual search, shape, and reflectance judgments.J Vis. 2007 Aug 31;7(11):11.1-7. doi: 10.1167/7.11.11. J Vis. 2007. PMID: 17997666
-
Interactions between "light-from-above" and convexity priors in visual development.J Vis. 2010 Jul 1;10(8):6. doi: 10.1167/10.8.6. J Vis. 2010. PMID: 20884581
-
Frames of reference for the light-from-above prior in visual search and shape judgements.Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):137-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Oct 22. Cognition. 2008. PMID: 17950264
-
Asymmetry in the perception of motion-in-depth.Vision Res. 2004 May;44(10):1003-11. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.07.012. Vision Res. 2004. PMID: 15031093
-
Processing convexity and concavity along a 2-D contour: figure-ground, structural shape, and attention.Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Apr;20(2):191-207. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0347-2. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013. PMID: 23188740 Review.
Cited by
-
Generalization of cue recruitment to non-moving stimuli: location and surface-texture contingent biases for 3-D shape perception.Vision Res. 2013 Apr 19;82:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Feb 22. Vision Res. 2013. PMID: 23438583 Free PMC article.
-
The what and why of perceptual asymmetries in the visual domain.Adv Cogn Psychol. 2010 Dec 15;6:103-15. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0080-6. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2010. PMID: 21228922 Free PMC article.
-
Experience affects the use of ego-motion signals during 3D shape perception.J Vis. 2010 Dec 29;10(14):30. doi: 10.1167/10.14.30. J Vis. 2010. PMID: 21191132 Free PMC article.
-
The light-from-above prior is intact in autistic children.J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Sep;161:113-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 May 15. J Exp Child Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28521245 Free PMC article.
-
Efficient visual recalibration from either visual or haptic feedback: the importance of being wrong.J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 3;30(44):14745-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2749-10.2010. J Neurosci. 2010. PMID: 21048133 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources