Attention changes perceived size of moving visual patterns
- PMID: 17997660
- DOI: 10.1167/7.11.5
Attention changes perceived size of moving visual patterns
Abstract
Spatial attention shifts receptive fields in monkey extrastriate visual cortex toward the focus of attention (S. Ben Hamed, J. R. Duhamel, F. Bremmer, & W. Graf, 2002; C. E. Connor, J. L. Gallant, D. C. Preddie, & D. C. Van Essen, 1996; C. E. Connor, D. C. Preddie, J. L. Gallant, & D. C. Van Essen, 1997; T. Womelsdorf, K. Anton-Erxleben, F. Pieper, & S. Treue, 2006). This distortion in the retinotopic distribution of receptive fields might cause distortions in spatial perception such as an increase of the perceived size of attended stimuli. Here we test for such an effect in human subjects by measuring the point of subjective equality (PSE) for the perceived size of a neutral and an attended stimulus when drawing automatic attention to one of two spatial locations. We found a significant increase in perceived size of attended stimuli. Depending on the absolute stimulus size, this effect ranged from 4% to 12% and was more pronounced for smaller than for larger stimuli. In our experimental design, an attentional effect on task difficulty or a cue bias might influence the PSE measure. We performed control experiments and indeed found such effects, but they could only account for part of the observed results. Our findings demonstrate that the allocation of transient spatial attention onto a visual stimulus increases its perceived size and additionally biases subjects to select this stimulus for a perceptual judgment.
Similar articles
-
Matching cue size and task properties in exogenous attention.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(12):2363-75. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.780086. Epub 2013 Apr 10. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013. PMID: 23574543
-
Effect of spatial distance to the task stimulus on task-irrelevant perceptual learning of static Gabors.J Vis. 2007 Oct 12;7(13):2.1-10. doi: 10.1167/7.13.2. J Vis. 2007. PMID: 17997630
-
Center-surround effects on perceived speed.Vision Res. 2010 Aug 23;50(18):1900-4. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.06.012. Epub 2010 Jun 25. Vision Res. 2010. PMID: 20600233
-
Dynamics of emotional effects on spatial attention in the human visual cortex.Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:67-91. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56004-2. Prog Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 17015075 Review.
-
Spatial Constraints in Multisensory Attention.In: Murray MM, Wallace MT, editors. The Neural Bases of Multisensory Processes. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2012. Chapter 25. In: Murray MM, Wallace MT, editors. The Neural Bases of Multisensory Processes. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2012. Chapter 25. PMID: 22593891 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Visual attention: the past 25 years.Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1484-525. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012. Epub 2011 Apr 28. Vision Res. 2011. PMID: 21549742 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Where does attention go when it moves? Spatial properties and locus of the attentional repulsion effect.J Vis. 2010 Oct 27;10(12):33. doi: 10.1167/10.12.33. J Vis. 2010. PMID: 21047765 Free PMC article.
-
Cue contrast modulates the effects of exogenous attention on appearance.Vision Res. 2009 Jul;49(14):1825-37. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.019. Epub 2009 Apr 22. Vision Res. 2009. PMID: 19393260 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Suboptimality in perceptual decision making.Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Feb 27;41:e223. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18000936. Behav Brain Sci. 2018. PMID: 29485020 Free PMC article.
-
How Does Attention Alter Length Perception? A Prism Adaptation Study.Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 18;11:2091. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02091. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32973630 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources