Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov 12:2:35.
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-35.

Incorporating a gender perspective into the development of clinical guidelines: a training course for guideline developers

Affiliations

Incorporating a gender perspective into the development of clinical guidelines: a training course for guideline developers

Debby G Keuken et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Dutch guideline-developing organizations do not focus systematically on differences between men and women when developing guidelines, even though there is increasing evidence that being male or female may have an effect on health and health outcomes. In collaboration with two prominent Dutch guideline-developing organizations, we designed a training course to encourage systematic attention to sex differences in guideline development procedures.

Methods: The course is targeted towards guideline developers. Its aims are to improve awareness concerning the relevance of considering sex differences in the guideline development process, as well as the competence and skills necessary for putting this into practice. The design and teaching methods of the course are based on adult learning styles and principles of changing provider behaviour. It was adjusted to the working methods of guideline organizations. The course was taught to, and evaluated by, a group of staff members from two guideline organizations in the Netherlands.

Results: The course consists of five modules, each of which corresponds to a key step in the guideline development process. The participants rated the training course positively on content, programme, and trainers. Their written comments suggest that the course met its objectives.

Conclusion: The training course is the first to address sex differences in guideline development. Results from the pilot test suggest that the course achieved its objectives. Because its modules and teaching methods of the course are widely transferable, the course could be useful for many organizations that are involved in developing guidelines. Follow-up studies are needed to assess the long-term effect of the course on the actions of guideline developers and its utility in other settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M. In: Improving patient care The implementation of change in clinical practice. Grol R, Wensing M and Eccles M, editor. Oxford, Elsevier; 2005.
    1. Shekelle PG, Woolf SH, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318:593–596. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine.Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. In: Guidelines for clinical practice from development to use. Field MJ and Lohr KN, editor. Washington, D.C, National Academy Press; 1992.
    1. Sign 50: A guideline developers' handbook. 2004. http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/50/index.html
    1. Burgers JS, Grol R, Klazinga NS, Makela M, Zaat J. Towards evidence-based clinical practice: an international survey of 18 clinical guideline programs. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15:31–45. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/15.1.31. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources