Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Oct 15;71(5):83.
doi: 10.5688/aj710583.

The structured interview and interviewer training in the admissions process

Pamela U Joyner  1 , Wendy C Cox, Carla White-Harris, Susan J Blalock
Affiliations

The structured interview and interviewer training in the admissions process

Pamela U Joyner et al. Am J Pharm Educ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the extent to which the structured interview is used in the PharmD admissions process in US colleges and schools of pharmacy, and the prevalence and content of interviewer training.

Methods: A survey instrument consisting of 7 questions regarding interviews and interviewer training was sent to 92 colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States that were accredited or seeking accreditation.

Results: Sixty survey instruments (65% response rate) were returned. The majority of the schools that responded (80%) used interviews as part of the PharmD admissions process. Of the schools that used an interview as part of the admissions process, 86% provided some type of interviewer training and 13% used a set of predefined questions in admissions interviews.

Conclusions: Most colleges and schools of pharmacy use some components of the structured interview in the PharmD admissions process; however, training for interviewers varies widely among colleges and schools of pharmacy.

Keywords: admissions; interview; interviewer training; structured interview.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Kuncel NR, Crede M, Thomas LL, Klieger DM, Seiler SN, Woo SE. A meta-analysis of the validity of the pharmacy college admission test (PCAT) and grade predictors of pharmacy student performance. Am J Pharm Educ. 2005;69 Article 51.
    1. McCall KL, Allen DD, Fike DS. Predictors of academic success in a doctor of pharmacy program. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70 Article 106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Latif DA. Including the assessment of nontraditional factors in pharmacy school admissions. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39:721–6. - PubMed
    1. Chesnut RJ, Phillips CR. Current practices and anticipated changes in academic and nonacademic admission sources for entry-level PharmD programs. Am J Pharm Educ. 2000;64:251–9.
    1. Accreditation Standards and Guidelines for the Professional Program in Pharmacy Leading to the Doctor of Pharmacy Degree, Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education, Inc., Chicago IL (January 15, 2006). Available at: http://www.acpe-accredit.org. Accessed September 13, 2006.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources