Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Dec;61(12):1028-37.
doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.054999.

The psychosocial and health effects of workplace reorganisation. 2. A systematic review of task restructuring interventions

Affiliations

The psychosocial and health effects of workplace reorganisation. 2. A systematic review of task restructuring interventions

Clare Bambra et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the health and psychosocial effects (with reference to the demand-control-support model) of changes to the work environment brought about by task structure work reorganisation, and to determine whether those effects differ for different socioeconomic groups.

Design: Systematic review (QUORUM) of experimental and quasi-experimental studies (any language) reporting health and psychosocial effects of such interventions.

Data sources: Seventeen electronic databases (medical, social science and economic), bibliographies and expert contacts.

Results: Nineteen studies were reviewed. Some task-restructuring interventions failed to alter the psychosocial work environment significantly, and so could not be expected to have a measurable effect on health. Those that increased demand and decreased control tended to have an adverse effect on health, while those that decreased demand and increased control resulted in improved health, although some effects were minimal. Increases in workplace support did not appear to mediate this relationship.

Conclusion: This systematic review suggests that task-restructuring interventions that increase demand or decrease control adversely affect the health of employees, in line with observational research. It lends support to policy initiatives such as the recently enforced EU directive on participation at work, which aims to increase job control and autonomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Wanless D.Securing good health for the whole population: final report (the Wanless report). London: HM Treasury, 2004
    1. Department of Health Choosing health: making healthier choices easier. London: Stationery Office, 2004
    1. Karasek R, Theorell T.Healthy work: stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books, 1990
    1. Karasek R. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q 197924285–311.
    1. Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high effort/low‐reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1996127–41. - PubMed

Publication types