Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Dec;61(12):1086-90.
doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.053967.

Functional health literacy and health-promoting behaviour in a national sample of British adults

Christian von Wagner  1 , Katherine Knight, Andrew Steptoe, Jane Wardle
Affiliations

Functional health literacy and health-promoting behaviour in a national sample of British adults

Christian von Wagner et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To measure the prevalence of limited functional health literacy in the UK, and examine associations with health behaviours and self-rated health.

Design: Psychometric testing using a British version of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) in a population sample of adults.

Setting: UK-wide interview survey (excluding Northern Ireland and the Scottish Isles).

Participants: 759 adults (439 women, 320 men) aged 18-90 years (mean age _ 47.6 years) selected using random location sampling.

Main outcome measures: Functional health literacy, self-rated health, fruit and vegetable consumption, physical exercise and smoking.

Results: We found that 11.4% of participants had either marginal or inadequate health literacy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that the risk of having limitations in health literacy increased with age (adjusted odds ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.06), being male (odds ratio _ 2.04; 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 3.55), low educational attainment (odds ratio _ 7.46; 95% confidence interval 3.35 to 16.58) and low income (odds ratio _ 5.94; 95% confidence interval 1.87 to 18.89). In a second multivariable logistic regression analysis, every point higher on the health literacy scale increased the likelihood of eating at least five portions of fruit and vegetables a day (odds ratio _ 1.02; 95% confidence interval 1.003 to 1.03), being a non-smoker (odds ratio _ 1.02; 95% confidence interval 1.0003 to 1.03) and having good self-rated health (odds ratio _ 1.02; 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.04), independently of age, education, gender, ethnicity and income.

Conclusions: The results encourage efforts to monitor health literacy in the British population and examine associations with engagement with preventative health behaviours.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Institute of Medicine Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion Washington, DC: National Academic Press, 2004
    1. Paasche‐Orlow M K, Parker R M, Gazmararian J A.et al The prevalence of limited health literacy. J Gen Intern Med 200520175–184. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams M V, Parker R M, Baker D W.et al Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals. JAMA 19952741677–1682. - PubMed
    1. Baker D W, Parker R M, Williams M V.et al The health care experience of patients with low literacy. Arch Fam Med 19965329–334. - PubMed
    1. Gazmararian J A, Baker D W, Williams M V.et al Health literacy among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. JAMA 1999281545–551. - PubMed

Publication types