Low folding propensity and high translation efficiency distinguish in vivo substrates of GroEL from other Escherichia coli proteins
- PMID: 18006553
- DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm513
Low folding propensity and high translation efficiency distinguish in vivo substrates of GroEL from other Escherichia coli proteins
Abstract
Motivation: Theoretical considerations have indicated that the amount of chaperonin GroEL in Escherichia coli cells is sufficient to fold only approximately 2-5% of newly synthesized proteins under normal physiological conditions, thereby suggesting that only a subset of E.coli proteins fold in vivo in a GroEL-dependent manner. Recently, members of this subset were identified in two independent studies that resulted in two partially overlapping lists of GroEL-interacting proteins. The objective of the work described here was to identify sequence-based features of GroEL-interacting proteins that distinguish them from other E.coli proteins and that may account for their dependence on the chaperonin system.
Results: Our analysis shows that GroEL-interacting proteins have, on average, low folding propensities and high translation efficiencies. These two properties in combination can increase the risk of aggregation of these proteins and, thus, cause their folding to be chaperonin-dependent. Strikingly, we find that these properties are absent in proteins homologous to the E.coli GroEL-interacting proteins in Ureaplasma urealyticum, an organism that lacks a chaperonin system, thereby confirming our conclusions.
Similar articles
-
Proteome-wide analysis of chaperonin-dependent protein folding in Escherichia coli.Cell. 2005 Jul 29;122(2):209-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.028. Cell. 2005. PMID: 16051146
-
Co-expression of chaperonin GroEL/GroES enhances in vivo folding of yeast mitochondrial aconitase and alters the growth characteristics of Escherichia coli.Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;38(11):1975-85. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.05.013. Epub 2006 Jun 2. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2006. PMID: 16822698
-
Exploring the kinetic requirements for enhancement of protein folding rates in the GroEL cavity.J Mol Biol. 1999 Apr 2;287(3):627-44. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2591. J Mol Biol. 1999. PMID: 10092464
-
What distinguishes GroEL substrates from other Escherichia coli proteins?FEBS J. 2012 Feb;279(4):543-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08458.x. Epub 2012 Jan 4. FEBS J. 2012. PMID: 22177460 Review.
-
GroE chaperonin-assisted folding and assembly of dodecameric glutamine synthetase.Biochemistry (Mosc). 1998 Apr;63(4):382-98. Biochemistry (Mosc). 1998. PMID: 9556521 Review.
Cited by
-
Chaperones GroEL/GroES accelerate the refolding of a multidomain protein through modulating on-pathway intermediates.J Biol Chem. 2014 Jan 3;289(1):286-98. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.518373. Epub 2013 Nov 18. J Biol Chem. 2014. PMID: 24247249 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative genomic analysis of mollicutes with and without a chaperonin system.PLoS One. 2018 Feb 13;13(2):e0192619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192619. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29438383 Free PMC article.
-
Decoding Structural Properties of a Partially Unfolded Protein Substrate: En Route to Chaperone Binding.PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Sep 22;11(9):e1004496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004496. eCollection 2015. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015. PMID: 26394388 Free PMC article.
-
GroEL dependency affects codon usage--support for a critical role of misfolding in gene evolution.Mol Syst Biol. 2010;6:340. doi: 10.1038/msb.2009.94. Epub 2010 Jan 19. Mol Syst Biol. 2010. PMID: 20087338 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of chaperonin GroE substrates using small structural patterns of proteins.FEBS Open Bio. 2023 Apr;13(4):779-794. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13590. Epub 2023 Mar 14. FEBS Open Bio. 2023. PMID: 36869604 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials