Test characteristics of the 3-view abdominal radiograph series in the diagnosis of intussusception
- PMID: 18007208
- DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31815a0013
Test characteristics of the 3-view abdominal radiograph series in the diagnosis of intussusception
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the test characteristics of the 3-view abdominal radiograph series to exclude intussusception in children presenting to the pediatric emergency department.
Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective review of children for whom supine, prone, and lateral decubitus abdominal radiographs were performed as part of our standard diagnostic evaluation for intussusception. A pediatric radiologist masked to the patient's clinical data and outcome reviewed all radiographs. The criterion evaluated was whether air was visualized in the ascending colon on each of the 3 radiograph views. We determined the presence or absence of intussusception hierarchically by definitive radiological study report, surgical operative note, or clinical outcome.
Results: We analyzed 179 patients, of whom 27 (15.1%) were diagnosed with intussusception. The test characteristics of the 3-view radiograph series in the diagnosis of intussusception when all 3 views had air in the ascending colon were sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87-100), specificity of 18.4% (95% CI, 12.3-24.6), likelihood ratio for a negative test of 0 (95% CI, 0.01-1.53), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% (lower bound 95% CI, 98%). When at least 2 views had air in the ascending colon, the test characteristics were sensitivity of 96.3% (95% CI, 89.2-100), specificity of 41.4% (95% CI, 33.6-49.3), likelihood ratio for a negative test of 0.09 (0.01-0.62), and NPV of 98.4 (95% CI, 95.2-100).
Conclusions: Using specific criteria, the presence of air in the ascending colon on 2 or 3 abdominal radiograph views has the potential to substantially decrease the likelihood of or exclude intussusception.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy of plain radiographs to exclude the diagnosis of intussusception.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Sep;28(9):855-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318267ea38. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012. PMID: 22929143
-
Comparison of clinicians to radiologists in assessment of abdominal radiographs for suspected intussusception.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 May;29(5):584-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31828e62d6. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013. PMID: 23603646
-
Comparison of 2-view abdominal radiographs with ultrasound in children with suspected intussusception.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Feb;29(2):145-50. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182808af7. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013. PMID: 23364378
-
Colocolonic intussusception in a four-yr-old with a heart transplant: a case report and review of the literature.Pediatr Transplant. 2012 Sep;16(6):E225-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2011.01569.x. Epub 2011 Aug 23. Pediatr Transplant. 2012. PMID: 21883754 Review.
-
Intussusception.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Nov;24(11):793-800. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31818c2a3e. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008. PMID: 19018227 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical