Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2007 Nov;26(6):660-7.
doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.6.660.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological and activity-based interventions for cancer-related fatigue

Paul B Jacobsen  1 , Kristine A Donovan, Susan T Vadaparampil, Brent J Small
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological and activity-based interventions for cancer-related fatigue

Paul B Jacobsen et al. Health Psychol. 2007 Nov.

Erratum in

  • Health Psychol. 2008 Jan;27(1):42

Abstract

Context: Fatigue is among the most common and distressing symptoms experienced by cancer patients.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of psychological and activity-based interventions against cancer-related fatigue in cancer patients.

Data sources: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL.

Study selection: Randomized controlled trials of psychological and activity-based interventions involving adult cancer patients in which fatigue was an outcome were reviewed.

Extraction: Forty-one trials were reviewed and 30 were included in a meta-analysis.

Data synthesis: Fifty percent of psychological trials and 44% of activity-based trials rated fair or better in quality yielded significant findings favoring the intervention condition. Meta-analysis yielded an overall effect size of 0.09 (95% CI = .02- .16) favoring nonpharmacological conditions. Further analysis indicated that effect sizes were significant for psychological interventions (d-sub(w) = .10, 95% CI = .02-.18) but not activity-based interventions (d-sub(w) = .05, 95% CI = -.08 - .19).

Conclusions: Findings provide limited support for use of nonpharmacological interventions to manage cancer-related fatigue. The lack of research with heightened fatigue as an eligibility criterion is a notable weakness of the existing evidence base.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ahlberg K, Ekman T, Gaston-Johansson F, Mock V. Assessment and management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Lancet. 2003;362:640–650. - PubMed
    1. Badger T, Segrin C, Meek P, Lopez A, Bonham E, Sieger A. Telephone interpersonal counseling with women with breast cancer: Symptom management and quality of life. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2005;32:273–279. - PubMed
    1. Barsevick A, Dudley W, Beck S, Sweeney C, Whitmer K, Nail L. A randomized clinical trial of energy conservation for patients with cancer-related fatigue. Cancer. 2003;100:1302–1310. - PubMed
    1. Boesen E, Ross L, Frederiksen K, Thomsen B, Dahlstrom K, Schmidt G, et al. Psychoeducational intervention for patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma: A replication study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23:1270–1277. - PubMed
    1. Bordeleau L, Szalai J, Ennis M, Leszcz M, Speca M, Sela R, et al. Quality of life in a randomized trial of group psychosocial support in metastatic breast cancer: Overall effects of the intervention and an exploration of missing data. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2003;21:1944–1951. - PubMed

Publication types