SELDI-TOF MS whole serum proteomic profiling with IMAC surface does not reliably detect prostate cancer
- PMID: 18024530
- PMCID: PMC4332515
- DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.091496
SELDI-TOF MS whole serum proteomic profiling with IMAC surface does not reliably detect prostate cancer
Abstract
Background: The analysis of bodily fluids using SELDI-TOF MS has been reported to identify signatures of spectral peaks that can be used to differentiate patients with a specific disease from normal or control patients. This report is the 2nd of 2 companion articles describing a validation study of a SELDI-TOF MS approach with IMAC surface sample processing to identify prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Methods: We sought to derive a decision algorithm for classification of prostate cancer from SELDI-TOF MS spectral data from a new retrospective sample cohort of 400 specimens. This new cohort was selected to minimize possible confounders identified in the previous study described in the companion paper.
Results: The resulting new classifier failed to separate patients with prostate cancer from biopsy-negative controls; nor did it separate patients with prostate cancer with Gleason scores <7 from those with Gleason scores > or =7.
Conclusions: In this, the 2nd stage of our planned validation process, the SELDI-TOF MS-based protein expression profiling approach did not perform well enough to advance to the 3rd (prospective study) stage. We conclude that the results from our previous studies-in which differentiation between prostate cancer and noncancer was demonstrated-are not generalizable. Earlier study samples likely had biases in sample selection that upon removal, as in the present study, resulted in inability of the technique to discriminate cancer from noncancer cases.
Comment in
-
Putting the "bio" back into biomarkers: orienting proteomic discovery toward biology and away from the measurement platform.Clin Chem. 2008 Jan;54(1):3-5. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.097659. Clin Chem. 2008. PMID: 18160722 No abstract available.
-
Preanalytical influences in clinical proteomic studies: raising awareness of fundamental issues in sample banking.Clin Chem. 2008 Jan;54(1):6-7. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.097667. Clin Chem. 2008. PMID: 18160723 No abstract available.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun M. Cancer Statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:43–66. - PubMed
-
- Brawer MK, Chetner MP, Beatie J, Buchner DM, Vessella RL, Lange PH. Screening for prostatic carcinoma with prostate specific antigen. J Urol. 1992;147:841–5. - PubMed
-
- Catalona WJ, Smith DS. Comparison of different serum prostate specific antigen measures for early prostate cancer detection. Cancer. 1994;74:1516–8. - PubMed
-
- Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford CL, Jr, Beard JH, Pond HS, Terry WJ, et al. Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J Urol. 1990;143:1146–52. discussion 52–4. - PubMed
-
- Labrie F, Dupont A, Suburu R, Cusan L, Tremblay M, Gomez JL, Emond J. Serum prostate specific antigen as pre-screening test for prostate cancer. J Urol. 1992;147:846–51. discussion 51–2. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- CA 084986/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA 84968/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA 86368/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA086402/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA085067/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U24 CA086359/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA084968/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA 85067/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA084986/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U24 CA086368/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA086368/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA 86359/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA 86402/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical