Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2008 Jan;54(1):53-60.
doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.091496. Epub 2007 Nov 16.

SELDI-TOF MS whole serum proteomic profiling with IMAC surface does not reliably detect prostate cancer

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

SELDI-TOF MS whole serum proteomic profiling with IMAC surface does not reliably detect prostate cancer

Dale McLerran et al. Clin Chem. 2008 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The analysis of bodily fluids using SELDI-TOF MS has been reported to identify signatures of spectral peaks that can be used to differentiate patients with a specific disease from normal or control patients. This report is the 2nd of 2 companion articles describing a validation study of a SELDI-TOF MS approach with IMAC surface sample processing to identify prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Methods: We sought to derive a decision algorithm for classification of prostate cancer from SELDI-TOF MS spectral data from a new retrospective sample cohort of 400 specimens. This new cohort was selected to minimize possible confounders identified in the previous study described in the companion paper.

Results: The resulting new classifier failed to separate patients with prostate cancer from biopsy-negative controls; nor did it separate patients with prostate cancer with Gleason scores <7 from those with Gleason scores > or =7.

Conclusions: In this, the 2nd stage of our planned validation process, the SELDI-TOF MS-based protein expression profiling approach did not perform well enough to advance to the 3rd (prospective study) stage. We conclude that the results from our previous studies-in which differentiation between prostate cancer and noncancer was demonstrated-are not generalizable. Earlier study samples likely had biases in sample selection that upon removal, as in the present study, resulted in inability of the technique to discriminate cancer from noncancer cases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun M. Cancer Statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:43–66. - PubMed
    1. Brawer MK, Chetner MP, Beatie J, Buchner DM, Vessella RL, Lange PH. Screening for prostatic carcinoma with prostate specific antigen. J Urol. 1992;147:841–5. - PubMed
    1. Catalona WJ, Smith DS. Comparison of different serum prostate specific antigen measures for early prostate cancer detection. Cancer. 1994;74:1516–8. - PubMed
    1. Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford CL, Jr, Beard JH, Pond HS, Terry WJ, et al. Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J Urol. 1990;143:1146–52. discussion 52–4. - PubMed
    1. Labrie F, Dupont A, Suburu R, Cusan L, Tremblay M, Gomez JL, Emond J. Serum prostate specific antigen as pre-screening test for prostate cancer. J Urol. 1992;147:846–51. discussion 51–2. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances