Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Jan-Feb;14(1-2):64-78.
doi: 10.2119/2007-00102.Monneret.

Monitoring immune dysfunctions in the septic patient: a new skin for the old ceremony

Affiliations
Review

Monitoring immune dysfunctions in the septic patient: a new skin for the old ceremony

Guillaume Monneret et al. Mol Med. 2008 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Septic syndromes represent a major although largely underrecognized healthcare problem worldwide, accounting for thousands of deaths every year. It is now agreed that sepsis deeply perturbs immune homeostasis by inducing an initial tremendous systemic inflammatory response which is accompanied by an antiinflammatory process, acting as negative feedback. This compensatory inhibitory response secondly becomes deleterious as nearly all immune functions are compromised. These alterations might be directly responsible for worsening outcome, as they may play a major role in the decreased resistance to nosocomial infections in patients who survived initial resuscitation. Consequently, immunostimulatory therapies may now be assessed for the treatment of sepsis. This review focuses on immune dysfunctions described in septic patients and on their potential use as markers on a routine standardized basis for prediction of adverse outcome or of occurrence of secondary nosocomial infections. This constitutes a prerequisite to a staging system for individualized treatment for these hitherto deadly syndromes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simplified description of pro- and antiinflammatory systemic immune responses over time after septic shock. The dashed lines represent pro- or antiinflammatory responses; the bold line represents the result at the systemic level. The shift from a proinflammatory to an antiinflammatory immune response predominant at the systemic level likely occurs before 24 h after diagnosis of shock.

References

    1. Angus DC, Wax RS. Epidemiology of sepsis: an update. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:S109–16. - PubMed
    1. Brun-Buisson C, Meshaka P, Pinton P, Vallet B. EPISEPSIS: a reappraisal of the epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis in French intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:580–8. - PubMed
    1. Brun-Buisson C, Roudot-Thoraval F, Girou E, Grenier-Sennelier C, Durand-Zaleski I. The costs of septic syndromes in the intensive care unit and influence of hospital-acquired sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:1464–71. - PubMed
    1. Dombrovskiy VY, Martin AA, Sunderram J, Paz HL. Rapid increase in hospitalization and mortality rates for severe sepsis in the United States: a trend analysis from 1993 to 2003. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1244–50. - PubMed
    1. Zeni F, Freeman B, Natanson C. Antiinflammatory therapies to treat sepsis and septic shock: a reassessment. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:1095–100. - PubMed

Substances