Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support
- PMID: 18030540
- PMCID: PMC2173918
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0445-4
Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support
Abstract
Objectives: Among patients unlikely to attend a scheduled colonoscopy, we examined the impact of peer coach versus educational brochure support and compared these with concurrent patients who did not receive support.
Methods: From health system data, we identified 275 consecutive patients aged >50 who kept <75% of visits to 4 primary care practices and scheduled for a first colonoscopy from February 1, 2005 to August 31, 2006. Using block randomization, we assigned consenting patients to a phone call by a peer coach trained to address barriers to attendance or to a mailed colonoscopy brochure. Study data came from electronic medical records. Odds ratios of colonoscopy attendance were adjusted for demographic, clinical, and health care factors.
Results: Colonoscopy attendance by the peer coach group (N = 70) and brochure group (N = 66) differed by 11% (68.6% vs 57.6%, respectively). Compared with the brochure group, the peer coach group had over twofold greater adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of attendance (2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.99-4.63) as did 49 patients who met the prespecified criteria for needing no support (2.68, 95% CI = 1.05-6.82) but the AORs did not differ significantly for 41 patients who declined support (0.61, 95% CI = 0.25-1.45) and 49 patients who could not be contacted (0.85, 95% CI = 0.36-2.02). Attendance was less likely for black versus white race (AOR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.19-0.72) but more likely for patients with high versus low primary care visit adherence (AOR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.04-5.07).
Conclusion: For patients who often fail to keep appointments, peer coach support appears to promote colonoscopy attendance more than an educational brochure.
Figures
References
-
- American Cancer Society. Colorectal cancer facts and figures special edition. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2005. http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2005CR4PWSecured.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2007.
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1002/cncr.20276', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20276'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15139050', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15139050/'}]}
- Seeff LC, Nadel MR, Klabunde CN, et al. Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population. Cancer. 2004;15:2093–103. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1002/cncr.21333', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21333'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16092119', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16092119/'}]}
- Lafata JE, Williams LK, Ben-Menachem T, Moon C, Divine G. Colorectal carcinoma screening procedure use among primary care patients. Cancer. 2005;104:1356–61. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15068980', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15068980/'}]}
- Turner BJ, Weiner M, Yang C, TenHave T. Predicting adherence to colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy on the basis of physician appointment-keeping behavior. Ann Intern Med. 2004;6:140:528–32. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00164.x', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00164.x'}, {'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC1490266', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1490266/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16307622', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16307622/'}]}
- Denberg TD, Melhado TV, Coombes JM, et al. Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:989–95. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical