In vitro susceptibility of invasive isolates of Candida spp. to anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin: six years of global surveillance
- PMID: 18032613
- PMCID: PMC2224271
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01901-07
In vitro susceptibility of invasive isolates of Candida spp. to anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin: six years of global surveillance
Erratum in
- J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Sep;46(9):3184-5
Abstract
The echinocandins are being used increasingly as therapy for invasive candidiasis. Prospective sentinel surveillance for the emergence of in vitro resistance to the echinocandins among invasive Candida sp. isolates is indicated. We determined the in vitro activities of anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin against 5,346 invasive (bloodstream or sterile-site) isolates of Candida spp. collected from over 90 medical centers worldwide from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2006. We performed susceptibility testing according to the CLSI M27-A2 method and used RPMI 1640 broth, 24-h incubation, and a prominent inhibition endpoint for determination of the MICs. Of 5,346 invasive Candida sp. isolates, species distribution was 54% C. albicans, 14% C. parapsilosis, 14% C. glabrata, 12% C. tropicalis, 3% C. krusei, 1% C. guilliermondii, and 2% other Candida spp. Overall, all three echinocandins were very active against Candida: anidulafungin (MIC50, 0.06 microg/ml; MIC90, 2 microg/ml), caspofungin (MIC50, 0.03 microg/ml; MIC90, 0.25 microg/ml), micafungin (MIC50, 0.015 microg/ml; MIC90, 1 microg/ml). More than 99% of isolates were inhibited by < or = 2 microg/ml of all three agents. Results by species (expressed as the percentages of isolates inhibited by < or = 2 microg/ml of anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin, respectively) were as follows: for C. albicans, 99.6%, 100%, and 100%; for C. parapsilosis, 92.5%, 99.9%, and 100%; for C. glabrata, 99.9%, 99.9%, and 100%; for C. tropicalis, 100%, 99.8%, and 100%; for C. krusei, 100%, 100%, and 100%; and for C. guilliermondii, 90.2%, 95.1%, and 100%. There was no significant change in the activities of the three echinocandins over the 6-year study period and no difference in activity by geographic region. All three echinocandins have excellent in vitro activities against invasive strains of Candida isolated from centers worldwide. Our prospective sentinel surveillance reveals no evidence of emerging echinocandin resistance among invasive clinical isolates of Candida spp.
References
-
- Andes, D., and N. Safdar. 2005. Efficacy of micafungin for the treatment of candidemia. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 24662-664. - PubMed
-
- Bennett, J. E. 2006. Echinocandins for candidemia in adults without neutropenia. N. Engl. J. Med. 3551154-1159. - PubMed
-
- Cappalletty, D., and K. Eiselstein-McKitrick. 2007. The echinocandins. Pharmacotherapy 27369-388. - PubMed
-
- DeWet, N., A. Lianos-Cuentas, J. Suleiman, E. Baraldi, E. F. Krantz, M. Negra, and H. Diekmann-Berndt. 2004. A randomized double-blind, parallel-group, dose-response study of micafungin compared with fluconazole for treatment of esophageal candidiasis in HIV-positive patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39842-849. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
