Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Dec;151(6):635-41, 641.e1-2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.04.063. Epub 2007 Sep 4.

Self-perceived health, functioning and well-being of very low birth weight infants at age 20 years

Affiliations

Self-perceived health, functioning and well-being of very low birth weight infants at age 20 years

Maureen Hack et al. J Pediatr. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the self-perceived health of very low birth weight (VLBW; <1.5 kg) infants during young adulthood.

Study design: The population included 241 VLBW and 232 normal birth weight (NBW) controls who completed the Child Health and Illness Profile: Adolescent Edition (CHIP-AE) at 20 years of age. The CHIP-AE includes six domains: Satisfaction, Comfort, Resilience, Achievement, Risk Avoidance, and Disorders, and 13 profiles that characterize patterns of health. Results were compared between VLBW and NBW subjects adjusting for sex and sociodemographic status.

Results: VLBW subjects did not differ from NBW controls in the domains of Satisfaction or Comfort but reported less Resilience (effect size [ES] -0.19, P < .05), specifically in physical activity and family involvement. They reported better Achievement, specifically in work performance (ES 0.28, P < .05), more Risk Avoidance (ES 0.43, P < .001), and significantly more long-term medical, surgical, and psychosocial disorders. Similar proportions of VLBW and NBW subjects reported Excellent (15% vs 11%), Average (27% vs 34%), and Poor (12% vs 13%) profiles of health.

Conclusions: VLBW subjects report similar health, well-being, and functioning compared with NBW controls and greater risk avoidance. However, we are concerned that their lesser resilience may prove detrimental to their future adult health.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hack M, Flannery D, Schluchter M, Cartar L, Borawski E, Klein N. Young adult outcomes of very low birth weight children (VLBW, <1.5 kg) N Engl J Med. 2002;346:149–57. - PubMed
    1. Saigal S, Stoskopf B, Pinelli J, Streiner D, Hoult L, Panet N, et al. Self-perceived health-related quality of life of former extremely low birth weight infants at adulthood. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1140–8. - PubMed
    1. Cooke RWI. Health, lifestyle, and quality of life for young adults born very preterm. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89:201–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dinesen SJ, Greisen G. Quality of life in young adults with very low birth weight. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001;85:F165–F169. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hack M, Schluchter M, Cartar L, Rahman M, Cuttler L, Borawski E. Growth of very low birth weight infants to 20 years. Pediatrics. 2003. pp. e30–e38. Available at: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/112/1/e30. - PubMed

Publication types