Assessment of the deviation after biomechanical preparation of the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of root canals instrumented with three HERO rotary systems
- PMID: 18037059
- DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.07.029
Assessment of the deviation after biomechanical preparation of the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of root canals instrumented with three HERO rotary systems
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess the risk of deviation of the root canals prepared by 3 HERO rotary systems, used solely or in association, by means of preoperative and postoperative imaging of a cross-section of their coronal, middle, and apical thirds. Fifty mesiobuccal canals of human first molars were randomly divided into 5 groups of 10 specimens each: group A, HERO 642; group B, HERO 642 + HERO Apical; group C, HERO Shaper; group D, HERO Shaper + HERO Apical; group E (control), NitiFlex files. Fisher exact test showed that the differences between the percentages of the presence of deviation and the differences observed between the proportions of instrumented and noninstrumented walls were not statistically significant. No system presented absolute effectiveness, because each of them produced morphologic changes and failed to instrument all the walls of the root canals. A level of significance of .05 was adopted.
Similar articles
-
Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Nov;100(5):636-42. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.01.013. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005. PMID: 16243253
-
Evaluation of the root dentine cutting effectiveness of the HERO 642, HERO Apical and HERO Shaper rotary systems.Aust Endod J. 2008 Dec;34(3):94-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00086.x. Aust Endod J. 2008. PMID: 19032642
-
Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.Int Endod J. 2005 Jun;38(6):402-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00961.x. Int Endod J. 2005. PMID: 15910476
-
Ledge formation: review of a great challenge in endodontics.J Endod. 2007 Oct;33(10):1155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.07.015. Epub 2007 Sep 4. J Endod. 2007. PMID: 17889681 Review.
-
Separation of an endodontic instrument: clinical significance.J Tenn Dent Assoc. 2006 Spring;86(2):25-7. J Tenn Dent Assoc. 2006. PMID: 16895008 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Assessment of Canal Centering Ability and Transportation after Preparation with Twisted File and Bio RaCe Instrumentation.J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Jul;11(4):440-6. Epub 2014 Jul 31. J Dent (Tehran). 2014. PMID: 25584056 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Assessment of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Reciproc and One Shape File Systems Using CBCT-An In Vitro Study.J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):ZC31-ZC34. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24257.9660. Epub 2017 Apr 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017. PMID: 28571257 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of canal walls after biomechanical preparation of root canals instrumented with Protaper Universal rotary system.J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 Nov-Dec;17(6):590-5. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000600010. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009. PMID: 20027432 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of Root Canal Preparation Using Rotary System and Hand Instruments Assessed by Micro-Computed Tomography.Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2015 Jun 20;21:123-30. doi: 10.12659/MSMBR.893950. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2015. PMID: 26092929 Free PMC article.
-
Transportation and Centering Ability of Neoniti and ProTaper Instruments; A CBCT Assessment.Iran Endod J. 2017 Winter;12(1):43-49. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.09. Iran Endod J. 2017. PMID: 28179923 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources