Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov 28:7:193.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-193.

The effect of priority setting decisions for new cancer drugs on medical oncologists' practice in Ontario: a qualitative study

Affiliations

The effect of priority setting decisions for new cancer drugs on medical oncologists' practice in Ontario: a qualitative study

Scott R Berry et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Health care policies, including drug-funding policies, influence physician practice. Funding policies are especially important in the area of cancer care since cancer is a leading cause of death that is responsible for a significant level of health care expenditures. Recognizing the rising cost of cancer therapies, Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) established a funding process to provide access to new, effective agents through a "New Drug Funding Program" (NDFP). The purpose of this study is to describe oncologists' perceptions of the impact of NDFP priority setting decisions on their practice.

Methods: This is a qualitative study involving semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 46 medical oncologists in Ontario. Oncologists were asked to describe the impact of CCO's NDFP drug funding decisions on their practice. Analysis of interview transcripts commenced with data collection.

Results: Our key finding is that many of the medical oncologists who participated in this study did not accept limits when policy decisions limit access to cancer drugs they feel would benefit their patients. Moreover, overcoming those limits had a significant impact on oncologists' practice in terms of how they spend their time and energy and their relationship with patients.

Conclusion: When priority setting decisions limit access to cancer medications, many oncologists' efforts to overcome those limits have a significant impact on their practice. Policy makers need to seriously consider the implications of their decisions on physicians, who may go to considerable effort to circumvent their policies in the name of patient advocacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Greco PJ, Eisenberg JM. Changing Physicians' Practices. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1271–4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199310213291714. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eddy DM. Clinical policies and the quality of clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:343–7. - PubMed
    1. Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada Canadian Cancer Statistics 2006 Toronto, Canada. 2006.
    1. Moore R, Mao Y, Zhang J, Clarke K. Economic Burden of Illness in Canada. Ottawa: Health Canada; 1997. - PubMed
    1. Pater JL, Browman GP, Brouwers MC, Nefsky MF, Evans WK, Cowan DH. Funding new cancer drugs in Ontario: closing the loop in the practice guidelines development cycle. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3392–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances