Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in African American women
- PMID: 18042936
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djm223
Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in African American women
Erratum in
- J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Aug 6;100(15):1118
- J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Mar 5;100(5):373
Abstract
Background: The Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) is widely used for counseling and determining eligibility for breast cancer prevention trials, although its validity for projecting risk in African American women is uncertain. We developed a model for projecting absolute risk of invasive breast cancer in African American women and compared its projections with those from the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool.
Methods: Data from 1607 African American women with invasive breast cancer and 1647 African American control subjects in the Women's Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences (CARE) Study were used to compute relative and attributable risks that were based on age at menarche, number of affected mother or sisters, and number of previous benign biopsy examinations. Absolute risks were obtained by combining this information with data on invasive breast cancer incidence in African American women from the NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program and with national mortality data. Eligibility screening data from the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) trial were used to determine how the new model would affect eligibility, and independent data from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) were used to assess how well numbers of invasive breast cancers predicted by the new model agreed with observed cancers.
Results: Tables and graphs for estimating relative risks and projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk with confidence intervals were developed for African American women. Relative risks for family history and number of biopsies and attributable risks estimated from the CARE population were lower than those from the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool, as was the discriminatory accuracy (i.e., concordance). Using eligibility screening data from the STAR trial, we estimated that 30.3% of African American women would have had 5-year invasive breast cancer risks of at least 1.66% by use of the CARE model, compared with only 14.5% by use of the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool. The numbers of cancers predicted by the CARE model agreed well with observed numbers of cancers (i.e., it was well calibrated) in data from the WHI, except that it underestimated risk in African American women with breast biopsy examinations.
Conclusions: The CARE model usually gave higher risk estimates for African American women than the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool and is recommended for counseling African American women regarding their risk of breast cancer.
Comment in
-
Re: Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in African American women.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 May 7;100(9):683-4; author reply 684. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn106. Epub 2008 Apr 29. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008. PMID: 18445823 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in Asian and Pacific Islander American women.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jun 22;103(12):951-61. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr154. Epub 2011 May 11. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011. PMID: 21562243 Free PMC article.
-
Projecting Individualized Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in US Hispanic Women.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Dec 20;109(2):djw215. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw215. Print 2017 Feb. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016. PMID: 28003316 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of a breast cancer risk prediction model developed for Black women.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Mar 6;105(5):361-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt008. Epub 2013 Feb 14. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013. PMID: 23411594 Free PMC article.
-
Carcinoma in situ outcomes in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Breast Cancer Chemoprevention Trials.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(41):181-6. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq041. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010. PMID: 20956826 Free PMC article. Review.
-
From adjuvant therapy to breast cancer prevention: BCPT and STAR.Breast J. 2001 May-Jun;7(3):144-57. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2001.007003144.x. Breast J. 2001. PMID: 11469927 Review.
Cited by
-
Traditional dietary pattern of South America is linked to breast cancer: an ongoing case-control study in Argentina.Eur J Nutr. 2014;53(2):557-66. doi: 10.1007/s00394-013-0564-0. Epub 2013 Aug 2. Eur J Nutr. 2014. PMID: 23907208
-
GeneHome - a Novel Model to Deliver Care to Individuals with Genetic Predisposition to Cancer.Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221109951. doi: 10.1177/10732748221109951. Cancer Control. 2022. PMID: 35976772 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of a Risk-Based Breast Cancer Screening Decision Aid on Initiation of Mammography Among Younger Women: Report of a Randomized Trial.MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Jan 17;4(1):2381468318812889. doi: 10.1177/2381468318812889. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun. MDM Policy Pract. 2019. PMID: 30729166 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of the risk of developing breast cancer using the Gail model in Asian females: A systematic review.Heliyon. 2020 Apr 22;6(4):e03794. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03794. eCollection 2020 Apr. Heliyon. 2020. PMID: 32346636 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development of a Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for Women in Nigeria.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Jun;27(6):636-643. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-1128. Epub 2018 Apr 20. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018. PMID: 29678902 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical