Is it time to standardize ethics guiding the peer review process?
- PMID: 18046592
- PMCID: PMC2248615
- DOI: 10.1007/s11745-007-3134-5
Is it time to standardize ethics guiding the peer review process?
Abstract
While most scientific journals have well defined ethics requirements for authors, very few journals explicitly specify the ethics standards that govern the actions of editors, editorial board members, and reviewers. We believe it is time to create a standardized policy for all medical and scientific journals that guides the ethical conduct of all stakeholders in the peer review process.
Comment in
-
The need for the persons involved as reviewers in the peer-review system to disclose potential conflicts of interest regarding the manuscript or the authors.Lipids. 2008 Feb;43(2):105-6. doi: 10.1007/s11745-008-3156-7. Lipids. 2008. PMID: 18236093 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Selective COX-2 inhibitors, eicosanoid synthesis and clinical outcomes: a case study of system failure.Lipids. 2007 Sep;42(9):779-85. doi: 10.1007/s11745-007-3069-x. Epub 2007 Jun 2. Lipids. 2007. PMID: 17541796 Review.
References
-
- James MJ, Cook-Johnson RJ, Cleland LG. Selective COX-2 inhibitors, eicosanoid synthesis and clinical outcomes: a case study of system failure. Lipids. 2007;42:779–785. - PubMed
-
- National Institutes of Health. Ethics Program, Principles of Ethical Conduct for Government Officers and Employees. [accessed October 5th, 2007]. http://ethics.od.nih.gov/principl.htm.
-
- Ethics of Peer Review: A Guide for Manuscript Reviewers. [accessed October 5th, 2007]. http://ori.hhs.gov/education/products/yale/prethics.pdf.
-
- Publication Ethics. [accessed October 5th, 2007]. http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/Publicationethics/#ethical_policy_tem....
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
