Detecting common mental disorders in primary care in India: a comparison of five screening questionnaires
- PMID: 18047768
- PMCID: PMC4959557
- DOI: 10.1017/S0033291707002334
Detecting common mental disorders in primary care in India: a comparison of five screening questionnaires
Abstract
Background: Screening of patients for common mental disorders (CMDs) is needed in primary-care management programmes. This study aimed to compare the screening properties of five widely used questionnaires.
Method: Adult attenders in five primary-care settings in India were recruited through systematic sampling. Four questionnaires were administered, in pairs, in random order to participants: the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ, 12 items); the Primary Health Questionnaire (PHQ, nine items); the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10, 10 items), and from which we could extract the score of the shorter 6-item K6; and the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ, 20 items). All participants were interviewed with a structured lay diagnostic interview, the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R).
Results: Complete data were available for 598 participants (participation rate 99.3%). All five questionnaires showed moderate to high discriminating ability; the GHQ and SRQ showed the best results. All five showed moderate to high degrees of correlation with one another, the poorest being between the two shortest questionnaires, K6 and PHQ. All five had relatively good internal consistency. However, the positive predictive value (PPV) of the questionnaires compared with the diagnostic interview ranged from 51% to 77% at the optimal cut-off scores.
Conclusions: There is little difference in the ability of these questionnaires to identify cases accurately, but none showed high PPVs without a considerable compromise on sensitivity. Hence, the choice of an optimum cut-off score that yields the best balance between sensitivity and PPV may need to be tailored to individual settings, with a higher cut-off being recommended in resource-limited primary-care settings.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures
Comment in
-
Common mental disorders in primary care in India: little to distinguish five commonly used screening instruments.Evid Based Ment Health. 2008 Nov;11(4):107. doi: 10.1136/ebmh.11.4.107. Evid Based Ment Health. 2008. PMID: 18952956 No abstract available.
References
-
- Adewuya AD, Ola BA, Afolabi OO. Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-9 as a screening tool for depression amongst Nigerian university students. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2006;96:89–93. - PubMed
-
- Andrews G, Slade T. Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2001;25:494–497. - PubMed
-
- Bower P, Gilbody S, Richards D, Fletcher J, Sutton A. Collaborative care for depression in primary care. Making sense of a complex intervention: systematic review and meta-regression. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2006;189:484–493. - PubMed
-
- Cairney J, Veldhuizen S, Wade TJ, Kurdyak P, Streiner DL. Evaluation of two measures of psychological distress as screeners for depression in the general population. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2007;52:111–120. - PubMed
-
- Chen TM, Huang FY, Chang C, Chung H. Using the PHQ-9 for depression screening and treatment monitoring for Chinese Americans in primary care. Psychiatric Services. 2006;57:976–981. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
