Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Feb;38(2):221-8.
doi: 10.1017/S0033291707002334. Epub 2007 Nov 30.

Detecting common mental disorders in primary care in India: a comparison of five screening questionnaires

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Detecting common mental disorders in primary care in India: a comparison of five screening questionnaires

V Patel et al. Psychol Med. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Screening of patients for common mental disorders (CMDs) is needed in primary-care management programmes. This study aimed to compare the screening properties of five widely used questionnaires.

Method: Adult attenders in five primary-care settings in India were recruited through systematic sampling. Four questionnaires were administered, in pairs, in random order to participants: the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ, 12 items); the Primary Health Questionnaire (PHQ, nine items); the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10, 10 items), and from which we could extract the score of the shorter 6-item K6; and the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ, 20 items). All participants were interviewed with a structured lay diagnostic interview, the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R).

Results: Complete data were available for 598 participants (participation rate 99.3%). All five questionnaires showed moderate to high discriminating ability; the GHQ and SRQ showed the best results. All five showed moderate to high degrees of correlation with one another, the poorest being between the two shortest questionnaires, K6 and PHQ. All five had relatively good internal consistency. However, the positive predictive value (PPV) of the questionnaires compared with the diagnostic interview ranged from 51% to 77% at the optimal cut-off scores.

Conclusions: There is little difference in the ability of these questionnaires to identify cases accurately, but none showed high PPVs without a considerable compromise on sensitivity. Hence, the choice of an optimum cut-off score that yields the best balance between sensitivity and PPV may need to be tailored to individual settings, with a higher cut-off being recommended in resource-limited primary-care settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interest

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) areas under the curve (AUCs) for questionnaires using the ICD-10 diagnosis for any common mental disorder (CMD) criterion. GHQ-12, 12-item General Health Questionnaire; K6 and K10, 6- and 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scales; PHQ, Primary Health Questionnaire; SRQ, Self-Reporting Questionnaire;

Comment in

References

    1. Adewuya AD, Ola BA, Afolabi OO. Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-9 as a screening tool for depression amongst Nigerian university students. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2006;96:89–93. - PubMed
    1. Andrews G, Slade T. Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2001;25:494–497. - PubMed
    1. Bower P, Gilbody S, Richards D, Fletcher J, Sutton A. Collaborative care for depression in primary care. Making sense of a complex intervention: systematic review and meta-regression. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2006;189:484–493. - PubMed
    1. Cairney J, Veldhuizen S, Wade TJ, Kurdyak P, Streiner DL. Evaluation of two measures of psychological distress as screeners for depression in the general population. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2007;52:111–120. - PubMed
    1. Chen TM, Huang FY, Chang C, Chung H. Using the PHQ-9 for depression screening and treatment monitoring for Chinese Americans in primary care. Psychiatric Services. 2006;57:976–981. - PubMed

Publication types