Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov-Dec;122(6):776-83.
doi: 10.1177/003335490712200609.

Panel classification of self-reported exposure histories: a useful exposure index after a mass-casualty event

David Van Sickle  1 , Mary Anne Wenck, Anne Wenck, Amy Belflower, Dan Drociuk, Jill Ferdinands
Affiliations

Panel classification of self-reported exposure histories: a useful exposure index after a mass-casualty event

David Van Sickle et al. Public Health Rep. 2007 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Although rapid epidemiologic investigations of toxic exposures require estimates of individual exposure levels, objective measures of exposure are often unavailable. We investigated whether self-reported exposure histories, when reviewed and classified by a panel of raters, provided a useful exposure metric.

Methods: A panel reviewed exposure histories as reported by people who experienced a chlorine release. The panelists received no information about health-care requirements or specific health effects. To each exposure case, each panelist assigned one of five possible exposure severity ratings. When assigned ratings were not in initial agreement, the panelists discussed the case and assigned a consensus rating. Percent agreement and kappa statistics assessed agreement among panelists, Kendall's W measured agreement among panelists in their overall ordering of the exposure histories, and Spearman's rho compared the resultant rankings with individual health outcome.

Results: In 48% of the cases, the panelists' initial ratings agreed completely. Overall, initial ratings for a given case matched the consensus rating 69% to 89% of the time. Pair-wise comparisons revealed 85% to 95% agreement among panelists, with weighted kappa statistics between 0.69 and 0.83. In their overall ranking of the exposure histories, the panelists reached significant agreement (W = 0.90, p < 0.0001). Disagreement arose most frequently regarding probable chlorine concentration and duration of exposure. This disagreement was most common when panelists differentiated between adjacent categories of intermediate exposure. Panel-assigned exposure ratings significantly correlated with health outcome (Spearman's rho = 0.56; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Epidemiologists and public health practitioners can elicit and review self-reported exposure histories and assign exposure severity ratings that predict medical outcome. When objective markers of exposure are unavailable, panel-assigned exposure ratings may be useful for rapid epidemiologic investigations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Excerpt from questionnaire and interview guide
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of initial exposure ratings (percent) among histories with consensus exposure ratings 1–5
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Belson MG, Schier JG, Patel MM. Case definitions for chemical poisoning. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005;54(RR-1):1–24. - PubMed
    1. Williams FL, Ogston SA. Identifying populations at risk from environmental contamination from point sources. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59:2–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sexton K, Adgate JL, Mongin SJ, Pratt GC, Ramachandran G, Stock TH, et al. Evaluating differences between measured personal exposures to volatile organic compounds and concentrations in outdoor and indoor air. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38:2593–602. - PubMed
    1. Sexton K, Adgate JL, Ramachandran G, Pratt GC, Mongin SJ, Stock TH, et al. Comparison of personal, indoor, and outdoor exposures to hazardous air pollutants in three urban communities. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38:423–30. - PubMed
    1. Wenck MA, Van Sickle D, Drociuk D, Belflower A, Youngblood C, Whisnant MD, et al. Rapid assessment of exposure to chlorine released from a train derailment and resulting health impact. Public Health Rep. 2007;122:784–92. - PMC - PubMed