Uterine activity monitoring during labor
- PMID: 18052832
- DOI: 10.1515/JPM.2007.116
Uterine activity monitoring during labor
Erratum in
- J Perinat Med. 2008;36(2):184. Van Rijsiwijk, Suzanne [corrected to Van Rijswijk, Suzanne]
Abstract
Aim: To summarize the currently available knowledge on (1) the methods to monitor uterine activity (UA); (2) the units to quantify UA; and (3) to assess the importance of abnormal contraction patterns on the condition of the fetus. The need for correct assessment and interpretation of the uterine contraction curve to improve fetal outcome will be emphasized.
Study results: Correct assessment of the uterine contraction curve is an essential part of the cardiotocogram and should be obtained by the best method available; i.e., internal tocography (IT). IT provides objective information on quantization of UA and has the ability to obtain a good quality trace in an obese, restless patient. Accurate information on UA is essential because elevated UA during the first and second stage of labor can increase the risk of adverse fetal outcome. The relaxation time appears to be an important contraction parameter to maintain fetal well-being during labor. Almost all abnormal contraction patterns are characterized by shortening of the relaxation time and can lead to severe asphyxia. Duration, amplitude and frequency of contractions are of importance as well. The mean active pressure unit is the means to quantify UA since it incorporates these three contraction parameters.
Conclusion: Proper application of UA monitoring by means of the internal method and adequate reading and interpretation of the uterine contraction curve is a prerequisite for high quality electronic fetal heart rate monitoring.
Similar articles
-
Uterine activity: implications for the condition of the fetus.J Perinat Med. 2008;36(1):30-7. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2008.003. J Perinat Med. 2008. PMID: 18184096 Review.
-
Elevated uterine activity increases the risk of fetal acidosis at birth.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;196(4):313.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.11.035. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17403401
-
The quality of intrapartum uterine activity monitoring.J Perinat Med. 2008;36(3):197-201. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2008.027. J Perinat Med. 2008. PMID: 18576927
-
Comparison of two intrauterine pressure catheters during labor.J Reprod Med. 2003 Jul;48(7):501-5. J Reprod Med. 2003. PMID: 12953323
-
[Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part I. Contractions monitoring].Ginekol Pol. 2008 Nov;79(11):791-7. Ginekol Pol. 2008. PMID: 19140504 Review. Polish.
Cited by
-
Modeling and experimental approaches for elucidating multi-scale uterine smooth muscle electro- and mechano-physiology: A review.Front Physiol. 2022 Oct 7;13:1017649. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1017649. eCollection 2022. Front Physiol. 2022. PMID: 36277190 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Computerised Cardiotocography Analysis for the Automated Detection of Fetal Compromise during Labour: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Aug 25;10(9):1007. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10091007. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37760109 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Uterine Monitoring Techniques from Patients' and Users' Perspectives.AJP Rep. 2018 Jul;8(3):e184-e191. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669409. Epub 2018 Sep 14. AJP Rep. 2018. PMID: 30250758 Free PMC article.
-
Multichannel mapping of in vivo rat uterine myometrium exhibits both high and low frequency electrical activity in non-pregnancy.Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 27;14(1):7316. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57734-3. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38538670 Free PMC article.
-
Developments in functional imaging of the placenta.Br J Radiol. 2023 Jul;96(1147):20211010. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20211010. Epub 2022 Mar 15. Br J Radiol. 2023. PMID: 35234516 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical