Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Sep;7(3):148-54.
doi: 10.5555/afhs.2007.7.3.148.

Drug sensitivity patterns of bacterial isolates from septic post-operative wounds in a regional referral hospital in Uganda

Affiliations

Drug sensitivity patterns of bacterial isolates from septic post-operative wounds in a regional referral hospital in Uganda

J R Anguzu et al. Afr Health Sci. 2007 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Wound infections have been a problem in the field of surgery for a long time. Advances in control of infections have not completely eradicated this problem because of development of drug resistance. Antimicrobial resistance can increase complications and costs associated with procedures and treatment.

Objective: A study was carried out on drug sensitivity patterns of bacterial isolates from septic postoperative wounds in Jinja hospital, Uganda. This study was designed to determine the distribution of bacterial pathogens isolated from septic post-operative wounds and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns.

Method: Specimens of pus swabs were collected aseptically and analysed in the laboratory. Colony characteristics and Grams technique were used to differentiate the organisms. Biochemical tests were done to confirm the species of the organisms. Sensitivity testing was done on the isolates using the disk diffusion method.

Results: Pathogenic bacteria were recovered from 58.5% of the specimens. The isolates were: S.aureus (45.1%), Coliforms (16.9%), Proteus mirabilis (11.3%), P.aeruginosa (9.9%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (7.0%) and Enterobacter spp (2.82%). Most of the organisms were sensitive to gentamicin, ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime. There was resistance to ampicillin, amoxycillin and chloramphenicol. Staphylococcus aureus was generally sensitive to gentamicin (87.5%), ciprofloxacin (68.7%) and methicillin (75%), but resistant to erythromycin (56.2%) and ampicillin (97%). Most of the gram-negative bacteria isolated (Coliforms, P.aeruginosa, E.coli, Proteus mirabilis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae) were sensitive to Ciprofloxacin, Gentamicin and Ceftazidime but resistant to Ampicillin, Amoxycillin and Chloramphenicol. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains formed 25% of this species. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was sensitive to gentamicin (87.5%) and ceftazidime (85.7%) but showed resistance to ciprofloxacin (57.2%). Some organisms e.g. S.aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus mirabilis exhibited multi-drug resistance to the antibiotics tested.

Conclusion: Since a high proportion of samples had positive cultures, infection control is recommended as a strategy to minimise spread of resistant organisms. It is recommended that gentamicin, ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime be used in preference to ampicillin and amoxycillin for treatment of septic wounds. There is need to develop national surveillance of antibiotic- resistant organisms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Antibiotics administered before surgical operation Key: Gm/Pen=Gentamicin/Crystalline-penicillin; Ampl=Ampiclox; Amox=Amoxycillin Metro=Metronidazole; Ampic=Ampicillin
Figure 2
Figure 2
Antibiotics administered after surgical operation Key: Gm/Pen=Gentamicin/Crystalline-penicillin; Ampl = Ampiclox; Amox =Amoxycillin; Metro=Metronidazole
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pus cells/Hpf in relation to positive cultures
Figure 4
Figure 4
Antimicrobial sen sitivity pattern for S.aureus (n=32) Key: GN = Gentamicin; CIP = Ciprofloxacin; E = Erythromycin; AP = Ampicillin MT = Methicillin

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barry AL. Procedure for testing antimicrobial agents in agar medium, in Theoretical consideration in laboratory medicine. 5th edition. Larian: 1986. pp. 1–26.
    1. Bauer AW, Kirby M, Sheris JD, Turch M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by standard single disc method. American Journal of Clinical pathology. 1966;45:493–496. - PubMed
    1. Brown AD. Bacteriology of wound infections in surgical ward of teaching hospitals. West African Journal of Medicine. 1990;9:4285–4290. - PubMed
    1. Buwembo KBM. Post operative wound infection. Kampala: Makerere University; 1990. pp. 1–45.
    1. Collee JG, Duguid JP, Fraser AG, Marmion BP. Mackie and McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology. 5th edition. Churchill Livingstone: Longman groups U.KLtd.; 1989.

LinkOut - more resources