Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Dec 3:7:197.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-197.

Improvement of psychometric properties of a scale measuring inpatient satisfaction with care: a better response rate and a reduction of the ceiling effect

Affiliations

Improvement of psychometric properties of a scale measuring inpatient satisfaction with care: a better response rate and a reduction of the ceiling effect

Leïla Moret et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: The objective was to solve two problems of an already validated scale measuring inpatient opinion on care: 1) a high non-response rate for some items due to the "not applicable" response option and 2) a skewed score distribution with high ceiling effect.

Methods: The EQS-H scale ("échelle de qualité des soins en hospitalisation") comprised 26 items and 2 sub-scales of 13 items each, 'quality of medical information' (MI) and 'relationships with staff and daily routine' (RS). Three studies were conducted: a first mono-centre study (n = 552, response rate = 83.4%, self-completion of the scale the day before discharge) to construct a shorter version of the scale without the items with high non-response rate and maintaining those useful to ensure good internal validity (construct, convergent and divergent) and reliability; a second mono-centre study (n = 1246, response rate = 77.9%, self-completion of the scale before discharge) to confirm psychometric properties of the new version; a third multi-centre national study (n = 886, response rate 41.7%, self-completion at home 15 days after discharge) to test a new response pattern in order to reduce ceiling effect.

Results: Six items having a non-response rate >20% were deleted, increasing rates of exhaustive response to all items from 15% to 48%. Factorial analysis supported the evidence for removing 4 more items to ensure good internal validity and reliability of the new version. These good results (initial variance explained: 43%; Cronbach's alpha: 0.80 (MI) and 0.81 (RS)) were confirmed by the second study. The new response format produced a normalisation of the 2 scores with a large decrease in ceiling effect (25% to 4% for MI subscale and 61% to 8% for RS). Psychometric properties of the final version were excellent: the 2 subscales (8 items each) explained 66% of the variance in principal component analysis, Cronbach's alpha were respectively 0.92 (MI) and 0.93 (RS).

Conclusion: The new version of the EQS-H has better psychometric properties than the previous one. Rates of missing values are lower, and score distribution is normalized. An English version of this scale focused on quality of medical information delivered and on relationship with staff already exists, and this could be useful to conduct cross-cultural studies of health care service quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structural equation model of the new version of EQS-H (N = 793). *Short names of items are given in Table 2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ross C, Steward C, Sinacore J. A comparative study of seven measures of patient satisfaction. Medical Care. 1995;33:372–377. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199504000-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hendriks A, Oort F, Vrielink M, Smets E. Reliability and validity of the Satisfaction with Hospital Care Questionnaire. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2002;14:471–482. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.6.471. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pettersen K, Veenstra M, Guldvog B, Kolstad A. The Patient Experiences Questionnaire: developement, validity and reliability. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2004;16:453–463. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh074. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larson C, Nelson E, Gustafson D, Batalden P. The relationship between meeting patients' information needs and their satisfaction with hospital care and general health status outcomes. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 1996;8:447–456. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/8.5.447. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Bruster S, Richards N, Chandola T. Patients' experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:335–339. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.335. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types