Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Mar;44(3):453-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2007.10.017. Epub 2007 Dec 3.

The role of the unfolded protein response in the heart

Affiliations
Review

The role of the unfolded protein response in the heart

Christopher C Glembotski. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2008 Mar.

Abstract

The misfolding of nascent proteins, or the unfolding of proteins after synthesis is complete, can occur in response to numerous environmental stresses, or as a result of mutations that de-stabilize protein structure. Cells have developed elaborate protein quality control systems that recognize improperly folded proteins and either refold them or facilitate their degradation. One such quality control system is the unfolded protein response, or the UPR. The UPR is a highly conserved signal transduction system that is activated when cells are subjected to conditions that alter the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in ways that impair the folding of nascent proteins in this organelle. Recent observations indicate that in the heart, the UPR is activated during acute stresses, including ischemia/reperfusion, as well as upon longer term stresses that lead to cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Moreover, certain aspects of the UPR are activated during, and are required for proper heart development. This review summarizes recent studies of the UPR in the heart, focusing on the possible roles of the UPR in contributing to, or protecting from ischemia/reperfusion damage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Unfolded Protein Response: Panel A- Under non-stressed conditions, proteins that are synthesized in the rough ER are efficiently folded. The ER-resident molecular chaperone, glucose-regulated protein-78 (GRP78), is associated with the luminal domains of the 3 proximal effectors of the unfolded protein response (UPR), PKR-like ER kinase (PERK), inositol-required enzyme-1 (IRE-1) and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6). Under these conditions, these 3 UPR effectors are inactive in terms of activating downstream effects of the UPR. Panel B- Stresses that perturb the redox status of the ER lumen, alter ER calcium levels, or disrupt the ER protein glycostylation machinery, result in the accumulation of mis-folded, dysfunctional proteins in the ER lumen, which initiates ER stress. Upon ER stress, GRP78 translocates from the luminal domains of PERK, ATF6 and IRE-1 to the misfolded proteins in the ER lumen in an effort to assist in folding. Under these conditions, PERK, ATF6 and IRE-1 and ATF6 are activated. Panel C- The PERK, ATF6 and IRE-1 branches of the UPR each mediate the transcriptional induction of ER stress response genes via the transcription factors, ATF4, ATF6 and XBP1, respectively. In addition, PERK can mediate global translational arrest by phosphorylation eIf2α, and IRE-1 can mediate the activation of JNK and caspase-12. Translational arrest decreases the workload on the ER, allowing time for recovery; however, the mRNAs encoded by many ER stress response genes have evolved structural features that allow them to escape this translational arrest, which is important for the up-regulation of ER stress response proteins upon acute stress. The JNK and caspase-12 branches of the UPR contribute to programmed cell death that takes place upon chronic ER stress. Many ER stress response genes encode ER-targeted chaperones, and other ER proteins that are designed to stabilize and/or re-establish an ER luminal environment that is suitable for nascent ER protein folding, facilitating cell survival and recovery from acute ER stress (Survival/Recovery). However, if the stress is not resolved, ER stress response genes induced upon chronic stress lead to apoptotic cell death (Apoptosis).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blobel G. Protein targeting. Biosci Rep. 2000 Oct;20(5):303–44. - PubMed
    1. Wang X, Robbins J. Heart failure and protein quality control. Circ Res. 2006 Dec 8;99(12):1315–28. - PubMed
    1. Patterson C, Ike C, Willis PWt, Stouffer GA, Willis MS. The bitter end: the ubiquitin-proteasome system and cardiac dysfunction. Circulation. 2007 Mar 20;115(11):1456–63. - PubMed
    1. Drummond IA, Lee AS, Resendez E, Jr., Steinhardt RA. Depletion of intracellular calcium stores by calcium ionophore A23187 induces the genes for glucose-regulated proteins in hamster fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1987 Sep 15;262(26):12801–5. - PubMed
    1. Lee AS. Mammalian stress response: induction of the glucose-regulated protein family. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;4(2):267–73. - PubMed