Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Nov;90(5):1685-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.037. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid plus prednisolone as an adjuvant treatment in IVF: a prospective, randomized study

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid plus prednisolone as an adjuvant treatment in IVF: a prospective, randomized study

Alberto Revelli et al. Fertil Steril. 2008 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To test whether adjuvant therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and prednisolone (ASA+Pred) could improve the outcome of IVF in good-pregnancy prognosis patients.

Design: Prospective, randomized study.

Setting: University hospital.

Patient(s): Three hundred ninety-five infertile couples undergoing IVF.

Intervention(s): Patients were randomized to receive ASA+Pred (n = 97) or nothing (n = 298), in addition to the routinely used IVF medications.

Main outcome measure(s): The primary endpoint was implantation rate (IR). Secondary endpoints were number of retrieved oocytes and pregnancy rate (PR). The blood flow in uterine arteries and subendometrial vessels also was measured.

Result(s): Patients who received ASA+Pred had significantly more retrieved oocytes. The PR and IR in the study group and in controls were 50.5% and 40.6% and 25.1% and 19.4%, respectively, values that were not significantly different from one another. Uterine blood flows were not significantly different between treated and nontreated patients. A statistically significantly lower incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was noted among treated patients who were at high risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (1.7% vs. 6.5%).

Conclusion(s): Adjuvant treatment with ASA+Pred improves ovarian responsiveness but does not significantly improve uterine blood fluxes, PR, and IR. It may be effective in preventing the onset of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms