Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Oct;20(5):308-13.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm054. Epub 2007 Nov 30.

Framework for primary care organizations: the importance of a structural domain

Affiliations

Framework for primary care organizations: the importance of a structural domain

William Hogg et al. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Conceptual frameworks for primary care have evolved over the last 40 years, yet little attention has been paid to the environmental, structural and organizational factors that facilitate or moderate service delivery. Since primary care is now of more interest to policy makers, it is important that they have a comprehensive and balanced conceptual framework to facilitate their understanding and appreciation. We present a conceptual framework for primary care originally developed to guide the measurement of the performance of primary care organizations within the context of a large mixed-method evaluation of four types of models of primary care in Ontario, Canada.

Methods: The framework was developed following an iterative process that combined expert consultation and group meetings with a narrative review of existing frameworks, as well as trends in health management and organizational theory.

Results: Our conceptual framework for primary care has two domains: structural and performance. The structural domain describes the health care system, practice context and organization of the practice in which any primary care organization operates. The performance domain includes features of health care service delivery and technical quality of clinical care.

Conclusion: As primary care evolves through demonstration projects and reformed delivery models, it is important to evaluate its structural and organizational features as these are likely to have a significant impact on performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual framework for primary care organizations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Starfield B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
    1. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Q. 2005;83:691–729. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donaldson MS, Yordy KD, Lohr KN, Vanselow NA, editors. Primary Care: America's Health in a New Era. Washington: National Academy Press; 1996. - PubMed
    1. Safran DG. Defining the future of primary care: what can we learn from patients? Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:248–55. - PubMed
    1. Shi L, Starfield B, Xu J. Validating the adult primary care assessment tool. J Fam Pract. 2001;50:161–75.

Publication types