Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Dec;16(6):415-21.
doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017038.

Evaluating the clinical appropriateness of nurses' prescribing practice: method development and findings from an expert panel analysis

Sue Latter  1 , Jill Maben, Michelle Myall, Amanda Young
Affiliations

Evaluating the clinical appropriateness of nurses' prescribing practice: method development and findings from an expert panel analysis

Sue Latter et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The number of nurses independently prescribing medicines in England is rising steadily. There had been no attempt systematically to evaluate the clinical appropriateness of nurses' prescribing decisions.

Aims: (i) To establish a method of assessing the clinical appropriateness of nurses' prescribing decisions; (ii) to evaluate the prescribing decisions of a sample of nurses, using this method.

Method: A modified version of the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) was developed, piloted and subsequently used by seven medical prescribing experts to rate transcripts of 12 nurse prescriber consultations selected from a larger database of 118 audio-recorded consultations collected as part of a national evaluation. Experts were also able to give written qualitative comments on each of the MAI dimensions applied to each of the consultations.

Analysis: Experts' ratings were analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative comments were subjected to a process of content analysis to identify themes within and across both MAI items and consultations.

Results: Experts' application of the modified MAI to transcripts of nurse prescriber consultations demonstrated validity and feasibility as a method of assessing the clinical appropriateness of nurses' prescribing decisions. In the majority of assessments made by the expert panel, nurses' prescribing decisions were rated as clinically appropriate on all nine items in the MAI.

Conclusion: A valid and feasible method of assessing the clinical appropriateness of nurses' prescribing practice has been developed using a modified MAI and transcripts of audio-recorded consultations sent to a panel of prescribing experts. Prescribing nurses in this study were generally considered to be making clinically appropriate prescribing decisions. This approach to measuring prescribing appropriateness could be used as part of quality assurance in routine practice, as a method of identifying continuing professional development needs, or in future research as the expansion of non-medical prescribing continues.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Department of Health The NHS plan. London: Department of Health, 2000
    1. Department of Health Extending independent nurse prescribing within the NHS in England: a guide for implementation. London: Department of Health, 2002
    1. Department of Health Modernising nursing careers: setting the direction. London: The Stationery Office, 2006
    1. Department of Health Mechanisms for nurse and pharmacist prescribing and supply of medicines. 2004. Search via http://www.doh.gov.uk (accessed October 2006)
    1. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency Consultation on options for the future of independent prescribing by extended formulary nurse prescribers. MLX 2005:320. Search via http://www.doh.gov.uk (accessed October 2006)

Publication types