Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2008 Feb;51(2):233-40.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0884-9. Epub 2007 Dec 1.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

D T Golicki et al. Diabetologia. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: We investigated the potential effects of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS), as compared with self-monitoring of blood glucose, on glycaemic control in children with type 1 diabetes.

Methods: The following electronic databases were searched throughout June 2007: MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library. Additional references were obtained from reviewed articles. Only randomised controlled trials were included.

Results: We included five trials involving 131 type 1 diabetic patients in the study. Combined data from all trials showed that the CGMS did not significantly reduce HbA1c levels compared with control groups. The pooled weighted mean difference was -0.02% (95% CI -0.29 to 0.25) with a fixed model and remained insignificant in the random effect model. Sensitivity analysis determined that the findings were stable. There was a trend towards a longer time under the CGMS curve for glucose <3.89 mmol/l in the CGMS group compared with the control group (mean difference 49.00 min, 95% CI -18.00 to 116.00). The CGMS significantly increased the number of insulin dose changes per patient per month for those managed with CGMS compared with the control groups (mean difference 6.3 changes, 95% CI 2.88-9.72).

Conclusions/interpretation: The Continuous Glucose Monitoring System is not better than self-monitoring of blood glucose with regard to improvement of metabolic control among type 1 diabetic children. However, due to the small number of participants and methodological limitations of the studies included, findings of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2000 Spring;2(1):49-56 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Care. 2006 Jan;29(1):44-50 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2002 Jan-Feb;18 Suppl 1:S49-53 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2004 Aug;6(4):435-41 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2004 Apr;6(2):105-13 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources