Outcomes assessment of clinical information system implementation: a practical guide
- PMID: 18061012
- DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.09.003
Outcomes assessment of clinical information system implementation: a practical guide
Abstract
Healthcare information systems (HIS) play a vital role in quality of care and the organization's daily operations. Consequently, increasing numbers of clinicians have been involved in HIS implementation, particularly for clinical information systems (CIS). Implementation of these systems is a major organizational investment, and its outcomes must be assessed. The purpose of this article is to provide clinicians and frontline informaticians with a practical guide to assess these outcomes, focusing on outcome variables, assessment methods, and timing of assessment. Based on in-depth literature reviews and their empirical experiences, the authors identified 3 frequently used outcomes: user satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and financial impact. These outcomes have been assessed employing various methods, including randomized controlled trials, pre- and post-test studies, time and motion studies, surveys, and user testing. The timing for outcomes assessments varied depending on several factors, such as learning curves or patients conditions. In conclusion, outcomes assessment is essential for the success of healthcare information technology, and the CIS implementation team members must be prepared to conduct and/or facilitate these studies.
Similar articles
-
The relationship between super users' attitudes and employee experiences with clinical information systems.Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Feb;66(1):82-96. doi: 10.1177/1077558708325984. Epub 2008 Dec 1. Med Care Res Rev. 2009. PMID: 19047764
-
Development of a measure of clinical information systems expectations and experiences.Med Care. 2007 Sep;45(9):884-90. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180653625. Med Care. 2007. PMID: 17712259
-
Human factors considerations relevant to CPOE implementations.J Healthc Inf Manag. 2005 Summer;19(3):71-8. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2005. PMID: 16045087 Review.
-
Using technology to reduce medication errors.Nursing. 2009 Jun;39(6):57-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000352344.05890.ba. Nursing. 2009. PMID: 19474619 No abstract available.
-
Nursing standards to support the electronic health record.Nurs Outlook. 2008 Sep-Oct;56(5):258-266.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.06.005. Nurs Outlook. 2008. PMID: 18922281 Review.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of nursing management information systems: a systematic review.Healthc Inform Res. 2014 Oct;20(4):249-57. doi: 10.4258/hir.2014.20.4.249. Epub 2014 Oct 31. Healthc Inform Res. 2014. PMID: 25405060 Free PMC article.
-
Role of computerized physician order entry usability in the reduction of prescribing errors.Healthc Inform Res. 2013 Jun;19(2):93-101. doi: 10.4258/hir.2013.19.2.93. Epub 2013 Jun 30. Healthc Inform Res. 2013. PMID: 23882414 Free PMC article.
-
A nursing informatics research agenda for 2008-18: contextual influences and key components.Nurs Outlook. 2008 Sep-Oct;56(5):206-214.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.06.007. Nurs Outlook. 2008. PMID: 18922269 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Determining of factors influencing the success and failure of hospital information system and their evaluation methods: a systematic review.Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013 Dec;15(12):e11716. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.11716. Epub 2013 Dec 5. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013. PMID: 24693386 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources