A comparative study on the biology of Cryptosporidium sp. from guinea pigs and Cryptosporidium parvum (Apicomplexa)
- PMID: 1806211
- DOI: 10.1139/m91-163
A comparative study on the biology of Cryptosporidium sp. from guinea pigs and Cryptosporidium parvum (Apicomplexa)
Abstract
Cryptosporidium sp. from guinea pigs and C. parvum were compared morphologically, electrophoretically, and for the ability to infect suckling mice. Oocysts from guinea pigs measured 5.4 x 4.6 (4.8-5.6 x 4.0-5.0) microns and had a shape index (length/width) of 1.17 (1.04-1.33). Oocysts of C. parvum were similar and measured 5.2 x 4.6 (4.8-5.6 x 4.2-4.8) microns with a shape index of 1.16 (1.04-1.33). All suckling mice inoculated with oocysts of C. parvum became infected, whereas most, but not all, mice fed oocysts of the guinea pig isolate also became infected. However, mice inoculated with oocysts from guinea pigs produced on average 100-fold fewer oocysts by day 7 postinoculation than did mice infected with C. parvum, and the resulting infections were sparse and patchy along the ileum. Electrophoretic profiles were similar, but 125I surface labeling of outer oocyst wall proteins revealed striking differences between the two isolates. Cryptosporidium parvum had a wide molecular size range of 125I-labeled bands, whereas C. sp. from guinea pigs had a banding pattern clustered between 39 and 66 kDa, with a smaller number of bands greater than 100 kDa.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the host ranges and antigenicity of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium wrairi from guinea pigs.J Protozool. 1992 May-Jun;39(3):406-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1992.tb01471.x. J Protozool. 1992. PMID: 1386385
-
Real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) assay targeting MIC1 for detection of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis oocysts.Exp Parasitol. 2017 Jan;172:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2016.12.009. Epub 2016 Dec 18. Exp Parasitol. 2017. PMID: 27998735
-
Evaluation of commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and immunofluorescent antibody (FA) test kits for detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts of species other than Cryptosporidium parvum.Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996 Mar;54(3):274-9. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1996.54.274. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996. PMID: 8600765
-
Cryptosporidium virulence determinants--are we there yet?Int J Parasitol. 2002 May;32(5):517-25. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(01)00356-3. Int J Parasitol. 2002. PMID: 11943224 Review.
-
Cryptosporidium species.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1989 Dec;10(12):570-2. doi: 10.1086/645954. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1989. PMID: 2693534 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Cryptosporidium taxonomy: recent advances and implications for public health.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Jan;17(1):72-97. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.1.72-97.2004. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004. PMID: 14726456 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A survey for potentially zoonotic gastrointestinal parasites in domestic cavies in Cameroon (Central Africa).BMC Vet Res. 2017 Jun 26;13(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1096-2. BMC Vet Res. 2017. PMID: 28651534 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium wrairi by reactivity with monoclonal antibodies and ability to infect severe combined immunodeficient mice.Infect Immun. 1995 Jan;63(1):360-2. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.1.360-362.1995. Infect Immun. 1995. PMID: 7806379 Free PMC article.
-
Cryptosporidium proliferans n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae): Molecular and Biological Evidence of Cryptic Species within Gastric Cryptosporidium of Mammals.PLoS One. 2016 Jan 15;11(1):e0147090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147090. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26771460 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials