Soil monitoring in Europe: a review of existing systems and requirements for harmonisation
- PMID: 18063012
- DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.046
Soil monitoring in Europe: a review of existing systems and requirements for harmonisation
Abstract
Official frameworks for soil monitoring exist in most member states of the European Union. However, the uniformity of methodologies and the scope of actual monitoring are variable between national systems. This review identifies the differences between existing systems, and describes options for harmonising soil monitoring in the Member States and some neighbouring countries of the European Union. The present geographical coverage is uneven between and within countries. In general, national and regional networks are much denser in northern and eastern regions than in southern Europe. The median coverage in the 50 km x 50 km EMEP cells applied all over the European Union, is 300 km(2) for one monitoring site. Achieving such minimum density for the European Union would require 4100 new sites, mainly located in southern countries (Italy, Spain, Greece), parts of Poland, Germany, the Baltic countries, Norway, Finland and France. Options are discussed for harmonisation of site density, considering various risk area and soil quality indicator requirements.
Similar articles
-
The possibilities for the EU-wide use of similar ecological risk-based soil contamination assessment tools.Sci Total Environ. 2008 Dec 1;406(3):523-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.07.034. Epub 2008 Aug 31. Sci Total Environ. 2008. PMID: 18762322
-
Toxicological database of soil and derived products (BDT).Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2008;44(1):81-7. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2008. PMID: 18469380
-
Estimating the soil organic carbon content for European NUTS2 regions based on LUCAS data collection.Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jan 1;442:235-46. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Nov 22. Sci Total Environ. 2013. PMID: 23178783
-
A European scale monitoring system to assess water quality of multi-national river basins in the accession countries.Water Sci Technol. 2003;48(10):103-9. Water Sci Technol. 2003. PMID: 15137159 Review.
-
Soil pollution and soil limit values.Cent Eur J Public Health. 2000 Feb;8(1):53-8. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2000. PMID: 10761629 Review.
Cited by
-
The LUCAS topsoil database and derived information on the regional variability of cropland topsoil properties in the European Union.Environ Monit Assess. 2013 Sep;185(9):7409-25. doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3109-3. Epub 2013 Feb 1. Environ Monit Assess. 2013. PMID: 23371251
-
How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realize the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal.Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Jan;26(1):219-241. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14815. Epub 2019 Oct 6. Glob Chang Biol. 2020. PMID: 31469216 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The role of metadata and strategies to detect and control temporal data bias in environmental monitoring of soil contamination.Environ Monit Assess. 2012 Nov;184(11):7023-39. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2477-9. Epub 2011 Dec 23. Environ Monit Assess. 2012. PMID: 22189794
-
Multivariate Exploratory Analysis of the Bulgarian Soil Quality Monitoring Network.Molecules. 2023 Aug 16;28(16):6091. doi: 10.3390/molecules28166091. Molecules. 2023. PMID: 37630343 Free PMC article.
-
Soil Particle Size Thresholds in Soil Spectroscopy and Its Effect on the Multivariate Models for the Analysis of Soil Properties.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Nov 14;23(22):9171. doi: 10.3390/s23229171. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38005556 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources