Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Feb;146(2):694-702.
doi: 10.1104/pp.107.108241. Epub 2007 Dec 7.

Kinetics and mechanism of Dionaea muscipula trap closing

Affiliations

Kinetics and mechanism of Dionaea muscipula trap closing

Alexander G Volkov et al. Plant Physiol. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

The Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) possesses an active trapping mechanism to capture insects with one of the most rapid movements in the plant kingdom, as described by Darwin. This article presents a detailed experimental investigation of trap closure by mechanical and electrical stimuli and the mechanism of this process. Trap closure consists of three distinctive phases: a silent phase with no observable movement; an accelerated movement of the lobes; and the relaxation of the lobes in their closed state, resulting in a new equilibrium. Uncouplers and blockers of membrane channels were used to investigate the mechanisms of different phases of closing. Uncouplers increased trap closure delay and significantly decreased the speed of trap closure. Ion channel blockers and aquaporin inhibitors increased time of closing. Transmission of a single electrical charge between a lobe and the midrib causes closure of the trap and induces an electrical signal propagating between both lobes and midrib. The Venus flytrap can accumulate small subthreshold charges, and when the threshold value is reached, the trap closes. Repeated application of smaller charges demonstrates the summation of stimuli. The cumulative character of electrical stimuli points to the existence of electrical memory in the Venus flytrap. The observed fast movement can be explained by the hydroelastic curvature model without invoking buckling instability. The new hydroelastic curvature mechanism provides an accurate description of the authors' experimental data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Experimental setup. [See online article for color version of this figure.]
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Closing of the trap with a 14-μC electrical stimulus.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kinetics of trap closure at 20°C (1) and 36°C (2) applying a 14-μC charge injection to the midrib; y is the distance between the edges of the lobes. A, Dependencies of distances between the edges of the lobes at 20°C (1) and 36°C (2) on time after electrical stimulation. B, Dependencies of the speed of trap closure formula image on time after electrical stimulation at 20°C (solid line) and 36°C (dashed line). [See online article for color version of this figure.]
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
The effect of anion channel blockers on charge-induced stimulation using two Ag/AgCl electrodes located in the midrib (+) and in one of the two lobes (−). The soil was treated by 25 mL of 10 mm 9-AC 24 h before experiments. A, Photos of the trap closing by different charge stimulations. B, Dependencies of the distance between the edges of the lobes (y) on injected charges. An additional electrical charge was injected to the plant every 5 s. The soil was treated by 25 mL of 10 mm 9-AC 4 h (2) or 24 h (3) before experiments. The capacitor was charged by a 1.5-V battery. [See online article for color version of this figure.]
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Kinetics of trap closing at 20°C by a 42-μC charge injection to the midrib; y is the distance between rims of lobes. A, Variation of distance between the edges of the lobes at 20°C after electrical stimulation. B, Variation of trap closure speed formula image with time after electrical stimulation at 20°C. The soil was treated by 25 mL of 10 mm 9-AC 4 h before experiments. The capacitor was charged by a 1.5-V battery.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Kinetics of a trap closing formula image after 70 μC electrical stimulation (1). Fifty milliliters of 10 μm CCCP was added to the soil 4.5 h before experiments. The soil around the Venus flytrap was washed with distilled water to decrease CCCP concentration (2).
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
The kinetics of trap closure after stimulation of the trigger hairs by a small piece of gelatin (2) or by 28 μC electrical stimulation (1). Fifty milliliters of 10 mm ZnCl2 was added to the soil 4.5 h before experiments. A, Dependencies of distances between the edges of the lobes on time at 20°C after electrical stimulation. B, Dependencies of trap closure speed formula image on time after electrical stimulation at 20°C.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
The mechanism of trap closure based on experimental and theoretical analysis of this work and experimental data from Volkov et al. (2007).

References

    1. Benolken RM, Jacobson SL (1970) Response properties of a sensory hair excised from Venus's flytrap. J Gen Physiol 56 64–82 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bobji MS (2005) Springing the trap. J Biosci 30 143–146 - PubMed
    1. Braam J (2005) In touch: plant responses to mechanical stimuli. New Phytol 165 373–389 - PubMed
    1. Brown WH (1916) The mechanism of movement and the duration of the effect of stimulation in the leaves of Dionaea. Am J Bot 3 68–90
    1. Brown WH, Sharp LW (1910) The closing response in Dionaea. Bot Gaz 49 290–302

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources