Nonrandomized comparison of primary chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage IIA and IIB nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer
- PMID: 18065732
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.0808
Nonrandomized comparison of primary chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage IIA and IIB nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with clinical stage (CS) IIA and IIB nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) with adenopathy more than 2 cm, multiple masses, elevated serum tumor markers, or disease outside the primary landing zone have increasingly been recommended to receive primary chemotherapy over time at our institution. The impact of these selection factors on the outcome of patients managed primarily by retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) or chemotherapy was examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1989 and 2002, 252 patients with CS IIA and IIB NSGCT were referred to our institution for initial management, of whom 136 underwent RPLND and 116 received chemotherapy and postchemotherapy RPLND. Patient information was obtained from a prospective RPLND database. Results Proportionately more patients received chemotherapy over time (22% in 1989 to 1993 v 68% in 1999 to 2002), and the relapse-free survival (RFS) subsequently improved from 84% (1989 to 1998) to 98% (1999 to 2002; P = .004) without increasing the proportion who received any chemotherapy (70% v 79%; P = .16). By increasingly selecting patients with adverse features for primary chemotherapy, the RFS after RPLND improved from 78% to 100% (P = .019), but rates of pathologic stage II and retroperitoneal teratoma were unaffected. Retroperitoneal histology and RFS did not change over time for chemotherapy patients. Primary chemotherapy was associated with improved RFS compared with RPLND (98% v 79%; P < .001), but disease-specific survival did not differ significantly (100% v 98%; P = .3). CONCLUSION Patient selection factors have significantly improved the outcome of patients with CS IIA and IIB NSGCT without substantially increasing the proportion of patients exposed to chemotherapy.
Comment in
-
Optimal management of retroperitoneal metastatic nonseminomatous testicular cancer: toward a better selection between scalpel and needle.J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 10;25(35):5550-2. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.8883. J Clin Oncol. 2007. PMID: 18065727 No abstract available.
-
Re: Nonrandomized comparison of primary chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage IIA and IIB nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer.Eur Urol. 2008 May;53(5):1086-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.02.011. Eur Urol. 2008. PMID: 18485322 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer: impact of patient selection factors on outcome.J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 20;23(12):2781-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.132. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15837993
-
The indication for postchemotherapy lymph node dissection in clinical stage IS nonseminomatous germ cell tumor.Cancer. 2008 Feb 15;112(4):800-5. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23233. Cancer. 2008. PMID: 18172902
-
[Efficacy of modified retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumors].Ai Zheng. 2008 Dec;27(12):1302-6. Ai Zheng. 2008. PMID: 19079998 Chinese.
-
Surgical management of low-stage nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer.BJU Int. 2009 Nov;104(9 Pt B):1362-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08860.x. BJU Int. 2009. PMID: 19840014 Review.
-
Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: does it still have a role in the management of clinical stage I nonseminomatous testis cancer? A European perspective.Eur Urol. 2008 Nov;54(5):1004-15. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.022. Epub 2008 Aug 13. Eur Urol. 2008. PMID: 18722704 Review.
Cited by
-
Surgical treatment of metastatic germ cell cancer.Asian J Urol. 2021 Apr;8(2):155-160. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 Jun 1. Asian J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33996470 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Management of good-risk metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis: current concepts and controversies.Indian J Urol. 2010 Jan-Mar;26(1):92-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.60449. Indian J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20535293 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Negative Pathology (pN0) at Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection.Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024 Dec;22(6):102217. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102217. Epub 2024 Sep 3. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39307609
-
Canadian consensus guidelines for the management of testicular germ cell cancer.Can Urol Assoc J. 2010 Apr;4(2):e19-38. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.815. Can Urol Assoc J. 2010. PMID: 20368885 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer at a national referral centre.BJUI Compass. 2022 Mar 31;3(5):363-370. doi: 10.1002/bco2.149. eCollection 2022 Sep. BJUI Compass. 2022. PMID: 35950045 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical