A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns
- PMID: 18067597
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x
A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the 5-year survival of implant-supported single crowns (SCs) and to describe the incidence of biological and technical complications.
Methods: An electronic MEDLINE search complemented by manual searching was conducted to identify prospective and retrospective cohort studies on SCs with a mean follow-up time of at least 5 years. Failure and complication rates were analyzed using random-effects Poisson's regression models to obtain summary estimates of 5-year proportions.
Results: Twenty-six studies from an initial yield of 3601 titles were finally selected and data were extracted. In a meta-analysis of these studies, survival of implants supporting SCs was 96.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 95.9-97.6%] after 5 years. The survival rate of SCs supported by implants was 94.5% (95% CI: 92.5-95.9%) after 5 years of function. The survival rate of metal-ceramic crowns, 95.4% (95% CI: 93.6-96.7%), was significantly (P=0.005) higher than the survival rate, 91.2% (95% CI: 86.8-94.2%), of all-ceramic crowns. Peri-implantitis and soft tissue complications occurred adjacent to 9.7% of the SCs and 6.3% of the implants had bone loss exceeding 2 mm over the 5-year observation period. The cumulative incidence of implant fractures after 5 years was 0.14%. After 5 years, the cumulative incidence of screw or abutment loosening was 12.7% and 0.35% for screw or abutment fracture. For supra-structure-related complications, the cumulative incidence of ceramic or veneer fractures was 4.5%.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that after an observation period of 5 years, high survival rates for implants and implant-supported SCs can be expected. However, biological and particularly technical complications are frequent.
Comment in
-
Growing body of evidence on survival rates of implant-supported fixed prostheses.Evid Based Dent. 2008;9(2):51-2. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400584. Evid Based Dent. 2008. PMID: 18584006
-
Implant supported single crowns offer good 5-year survival, but with complications.J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2008 Dec;8(4):232-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2008.09.011. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2008. PMID: 19027661 No abstract available.
-
Implant-supported single crowns predictably survive to five years with limited complications.J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012 Sep;12(3 Suppl):213-4. doi: 10.1016/S1532-3382(12)70040-4. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012. PMID: 23253848
Similar articles
-
Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:2-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012. PMID: 23062124
-
A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:4-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01787.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009. PMID: 19663946
-
Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs).Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:97-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01439.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007. PMID: 17594374
-
Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:163-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02538.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012. PMID: 23062142
-
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:22-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012. PMID: 23062125
Cited by
-
Long-term outcomes of the use of allogeneic, radiation-sterilised bone blocks in reconstruction of the atrophied alveolar ridge in the maxilla and mandible.Cell Tissue Bank. 2015 Dec;16(4):631-8. doi: 10.1007/s10561-015-9512-y. Epub 2015 Jul 11. Cell Tissue Bank. 2015. PMID: 26162810 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Global research trends of peri-implantitis during the last two decades: a bibliometric and visualized study.Am J Transl Res. 2023 Dec 15;15(12):6888-6896. eCollection 2023. Am J Transl Res. 2023. PMID: 38186975 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of physical changes due to simulated loading on prosthetic screw supporting 4- and 6-unit implant prosthesis: An in vitro study.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Oct-Dec;22(4):389-397. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_48_22. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022. PMID: 36511074 Free PMC article.
-
The current considerations in the fabrication of implant prostheses and the state of prosthetic complications: A survey among the dental technicians.Saudi Dent J. 2018 Oct;30(4):299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Jun 11. Saudi Dent J. 2018. PMID: 30202166 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the clinical success of four different types of lithium disilicate ceramic restorations: a retrospective study.BMC Oral Health. 2021 Dec 7;21(1):625. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01987-1. BMC Oral Health. 2021. PMID: 34876103 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical