Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr;22(4):885-900.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9678-x. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

Simulated laparoscopic operating room crisis: An approach to enhance the surgical team performance

Affiliations

Simulated laparoscopic operating room crisis: An approach to enhance the surgical team performance

Kinga A Powers et al. Surg Endosc. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: Diminishing human error and improving patient outcomes is the goal of task training and simulation experience. The fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) is a validated tool to assess technical laparoscopic skills. We hypothesize that performance in a crisis depends on technical skills and team performance. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a high-fidelity simulation model of a laparoscopic crisis scenario in a mock endosuite environment.

Methods: To establish the feasibility of the model as well as its face and construct validity, the scenario evaluated the performances of FLS-certified surgeon experts (n = 5) and non-FLS certified novices (n = 5) during a laparoscopic crisis scenario, in a mock endosuite, on a simulated abdomen. Likert scale questionnaires were used for validity assessments. Groups were compared using previously validated rating scales on technical and nontechnical performance. Objective outcome measures assessed were: time to diagnose bleeding (TD), time to inform the team to convert (TT), and time to conversion to open (TC). SAS software was used for statistical analysis.

Results: Median scores for face validity were 4.29, 4.43, 4.71 (maximum 5) for the FLS, non-FLS, and nursing groups, respectively, with an inter-rater reliability of 93%. Although no difference was observed in Veress needle safety and laparoscopic equipment set up, there was a significant difference between the two groups in their overall technical and nontechnical abilities (p < 0.05), specifically in identifying bleeding, controlling bleeding, team communication, and team skills. There was a trend towards a difference between the two groups for TD, TT, and TC. While experts controlled bleeding in a shorter time, they persisted longer laparoscopically.

Conclusions: Our evidence suggests that face and construct validity are established for a laparoscopic crisis simulation in a mock endosuite. Technical and nontechnical performance discrimination is observed between novices and experts. This innovative multidisciplinary simulation aims at improving error/problem recognition and timely initiation of appropriate and safe responses by surgical teams.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Interprof Care. 2005 May;19 Suppl 1:188-96 - PubMed
    1. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1:i33-40 - PubMed
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Apr;119(4 Pt 1):661-72 - PubMed
    1. Can J Anaesth. 2000 May;47(5):391-2 - PubMed
    1. J Interprof Care. 2005 May;19 Suppl 1:8-20 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources