Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Dec;48(6):814-21.
doi: 10.3325/cmj.2007.6.814.

Quality of life outcome of critical care survivors eighteen months after discharge from intensive care

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Comparative Study

Quality of life outcome of critical care survivors eighteen months after discharge from intensive care

George Fildissis et al. Croat Med J. 2007 Dec.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Aim: To assess the changes in health-related quality of life in patients discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: At the General University ICU, Trauma Hospital in Athens, 242 patients were enrolled prospectively over a study period of 18 months. Out of these, 116 participants (47.9%) completed all survey components at 6, 12, and 18 months. We used Quality of Life-Spanish (QOL-SP) to assess the health-related quality of life. Patients or their relatives were interviewed on ICU admission and at 6, 12, and 18 months after discharge from the ICU.

Results: Mean quality of life score of the patients increased from 2.9+/-4.8 (out of maximum 25 points) on ICU admission to 7.0+/-7.2 points at 6 months after discharge, and then decreased to 5.6+/-6.9 points at 18 months (P<0.001; Friedman Test). Multilinear regression analysis showed that the variables which had the strongest association with the quality of life on admission were age (P=0.002) and male sex (P=0.001), whereas age (P<0.001), length of ICU stay (P<0.001), and male sex (P=0.002) had the strongest association 18 months after discharge from the ICU. Survival rate was 66.9% at discharge from ICU and 61.6% at hospital discharge. There were 33% deaths in the ICU, 5.3% in the hospital, and 6.2% after ICU discharge. There were 7.4% patients lost to follow-up.

Conclusions: After discharge from the ICU, patients' quality of life was poor and showed an improvement at 18 months after discharge, but was still worse than on admission. Age, ICU length of stay, and male sex were the factors that had the strongest impact on the quality of life on admission and at 18 months after discharge from the ICU.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Enrollment of intensive care patients and follow-up for 18 months after intensive care.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of patients according to the level of their quality of life score on intensive care admission and after 6, 12, and 18 months. Level 1 = 0-1 points, Level 2 = 2-5 points, Level 3 = 6-9 points, Level 4 ≥ 10 points. The first column of each level represents ICU admission, the second 6 months, the third 12 months, and the fourth 18 months.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heyland DK, Konopad E, Noseworthy TW, Johnston R, Gafni A. Is it 'worthwhile' to continue treating patients with a prolonged stay (>14 days) in the ICU? An economic evaluation. Chest. 1998;114:192–8. - PubMed
    1. Garrouste-Orgeas M, Carlet J. Predicting whether the ICU can help older patients: score needed. Crit Care. 2005;9:331–2. doi: 10.1186/cc3750. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dowdy DW, Eid MP, Sedrakyan A, Mendez-Tellez PA, Pronovost PJ, Herridge MS, et al. Quality of life in adult survivors of critical illness: a systematic review of the literature. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:611–20. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2592-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chaboyer W, Elliott D. Health-related quality of life of ICU survivors: review of the literature. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2000;16:88–97. doi: 10.1054/iccn.1999.1582. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fernandez RR, Cruz JJ, Mata GV. Validation of a quality of life questionnaire for critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:1034–42. doi: 10.1007/BF01699224. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types