Management of diabetes in pregnancy: comparison of guidelines with current practice at Austrian and Australian obstetric center
- PMID: 18074418
- PMCID: PMC2213803
- DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2007.6.831
Management of diabetes in pregnancy: comparison of guidelines with current practice at Austrian and Australian obstetric center
Abstract
Aim: To compare Austrian and Australian national guidelines for gestational and pre-gestational diabetes and estimate the level to which physicians comply with their country's guidelines.
Methods: Austrian (ODG, Austrian Diabetes Society) and Australian guidelines (ADIPS, Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society) for the treatment of gestational diabetes and pre-gestational diabetes were systematically reviewed. Current practices in two obstetric centers in Austria and Australia were assessed by interviewing key stakeholders through questionnaires assessing different components of diabetes care. For gestational diabetes, these components were screening, abnormal oral glucose tolerance test values (mmol/L), abnormal values for diagnosis, further management when abnormal values are detected, monitoring/glucose targets (mmol/L), further management and indications for insulin therapy, route and timing of delivery, and postpartum management and counseling. For pre-gestational diabetes, the components were management during the preconceptional period, glucose target values, medical surveillance, obstetric surveillance, medication used, route and timing of delivery, and postpartum management and counseling.
Results: More variation was found in the management of gestational than pre-gestational diabetes. There were differences in oral glucose tolerance test and cut-off levels for diagnosing gestational diabetes in both centers and guidelines. Australian guidelines recommended two-stage screening for gestational diabetes, while Austrian guidelines recommended one-stage screening. At the Austrian obstetric center, amniocentesis was recommended for determining the start of insulin treatment in pregnant women with gestational diabetes. This approach was neither used at the Australian obstetric center nor recommended by any of the two guidelines.
Conclusion: Our study showed that it was difficult to standardize screening criteria and diagnostic methods for gestational and pre-gestational diabetes. National and international consensus has yet to be achieved in the management of diabetes in pregnancy.
Similar articles
-
Guideline use for gestational diabetes mellitus and current screening, diagnostic and management practices in Australian hospitals.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001 Feb;41(1):86-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2001.tb01301.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001. PMID: 11284655
-
Diagnosis and Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: An Overview of National and International Guidelines.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2021 Jun;76(6):367-381. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000899. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2021. PMID: 34192341 Review.
-
Gestational diabetes mellitus: Confusion among medical doctors caused by multiple international criteria.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Jun;41(6):861-9. doi: 10.1111/jog.12661. Epub 2014 Dec 29. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015. PMID: 25546555
-
Survey on testing for gestational diabetes mellitus in Australia.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Aug;56(4):346-8. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12457. Epub 2016 Mar 10. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016. PMID: 26968607
-
[Gestational diabetes mellitus].Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016 Apr;128 Suppl 2:S103-12. doi: 10.1007/s00508-015-0941-1. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016. PMID: 27052232 Review. German.
References
-
- Metzger BE, Coustan DR. Summary and recommendations of the Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. The Organizing Committee. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(Suppl 2):B161–7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical