Use of a validated delirium assessment tool improves the ability of physicians to identify delirium in medical intensive care unit patients
- PMID: 18074477
- DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000292011.93074.82
Use of a validated delirium assessment tool improves the ability of physicians to identify delirium in medical intensive care unit patients
Abstract
Objective: Although medical intensive care unit nurses at our institution routinely use the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) to identify delirium, physicians rely on traditional diagnostic methods. We sought to measure the effect of physicians' use of the ICDSC on their ability to detect delirium.
Design: Before-after study.
Setting: Medical intensive care unit of an academic medical center.
Patients and participants: A total of 25 physicians with >or=1 month of clinical experience in the medical intensive care unit conducted 300 delirium assessments in 100 medical intensive care unit patients.
Measurements and main results: Physicians sequentially evaluated two patients for delirium using whatever diagnostic method preferred. Following standardized education regarding ICDSC use, each physician evaluated two different patients for delirium using the ICDSC. Each physician assessment was preceded by consecutive, but independent, evaluations for delirium by the patient's nurse and then a validated judge using the ICDSC. Before (PRE) physician ICDSC use, the validated judge identified delirium in five patients; the physicians and nurses identified delirium in zero and four of these patients, respectively. The physicians incorrectly identified delirium in four additional patients. After (POST) physician ICDSC use, the validated judge identified delirium in 11 patients; the physicians and nurses identified delirium in eight and ten of these patients, respectively. The physicians incorrectly identified delirium in one patient. After physician ICDSC use, agreement improved between both the physicians and validated judge (PRE kappa = -0.14 [95% confidence interval {CI} = -0.27 to -0.02] to POST kappa = 0.67 [95% CI = 0.38 to 0.96]) and physicians and nurses (PRE kappa = -0.15 [95% CI = -0.29 to -0.02] to POST kappa = 0.58 [95% CI = 0.25 to 0.91]). Nurses vs. validated judge agreement was strong in both periods (PRE kappa = 0.65 [95% CI = 0.29 to 1.00] and POST kappa = 0.92 [95% CI = 0.76 to 1.00]).
Conclusions: Use of the ICDSC, along with education supporting its use, improves the ability of physicians to detect delirium in the medical intensive care unit.
Similar articles
-
Impact of a delirium screening tool and multifaceted education on nurses' knowledge of delirium and ability to evaluate it correctly.Am J Crit Care. 2012 Jan;21(1):e1-11. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012605. Am J Crit Care. 2012. PMID: 22210704
-
Adaptation and Validation of a Chart-Based Delirium Detection Tool for the ICU (CHART-DEL-ICU).J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Apr;69(4):1027-1034. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16987. Epub 2020 Dec 21. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021. PMID: 33348428 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting hospital mortality and length of stay: A prospective cohort study comparing the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist versus Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit.Aust Crit Care. 2023 May;36(3):378-384. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.01.010. Epub 2022 Mar 7. Aust Crit Care. 2023. PMID: 35272910
-
The predictive value of confusion assessment method-intensive care unit and intensive care delirium screening checklist for delirium in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Nurs Crit Care. 2024 Nov;29(6):1224-1235. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13064. Epub 2024 Mar 27. Nurs Crit Care. 2024. PMID: 38538305
-
Diagnostic accuracy of the CAM-ICU and ICDSC in detecting intensive care unit delirium: A bivariate meta-analysis.Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jan;113:103782. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103782. Epub 2020 Oct 3. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021. PMID: 33120134
Cited by
-
Differences between nurse- and physician-assessed ICU characteristics using a standardized survey.Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Oct;27(5):344-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv062. Epub 2015 Aug 13. Int J Qual Health Care. 2015. PMID: 26271545 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of Sedation Level and Ventilation Status on the Diagnostic Validity of Delirium Screening Tools in the ICU-An International, Prospective, Bi-Center Observational Study (IDeAS).Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Aug 13;56(8):411. doi: 10.3390/medicina56080411. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020. PMID: 32823781 Free PMC article.
-
A novel model to label delirium in an intensive care unit from clinician actions.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Mar 9;21(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01461-6. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021. PMID: 33750375 Free PMC article.
-
Delirium Incidence and Risk Factors in Adult Critically Ill Patients in Saudi Arabia.J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2019 Jan-Mar;12(1):30-34. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_91_18. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2019. PMID: 31057281 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing European Management of Analgesia, Sedation, and Delirium: A Multinational, Prospective, Interventional Before-After Trial.Neurocrit Care. 2024 Jun;40(3):898-908. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01837-8. Epub 2023 Sep 11. Neurocrit Care. 2024. PMID: 37697129 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical