Waiting for treatment for chronic pain - a survey of existing benchmarks: toward establishing evidence-based benchmarks for medically acceptable waiting times
- PMID: 18080042
- PMCID: PMC2670734
- DOI: 10.1155/2007/891951
Waiting for treatment for chronic pain - a survey of existing benchmarks: toward establishing evidence-based benchmarks for medically acceptable waiting times
Abstract
As medical costs escalate, health care resources must be prioritized. In this context, there is an increasing need for benchmarks and best practices in wait time management. In December 2005, the Canadian Pain Society struck a Task Force to identify benchmarks for acceptable wait times for treatment of chronic pain. The task force mandate included a systematic review and survey to identify national or international wait time benchmarks for chronic pain, proposed or in use, along with a review of the evidence upon which they are based. An extensive systematic review of the literature and a survey of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapter Presidents and key informants has identified that there are no established benchmarks or guidelines for acceptable wait times for the treatment of chronic pain in use in the world. In countries with generic guidelines or wait time standards that apply to all outpatient clinics, there have been significant challenges faced by pain clinics in meeting the established targets. Important next steps are to ensure appropriate additional research and the establishment of international benchmarks or guidelines for acceptable wait times for the treatment of chronic pain. This will facilitate advocacy for improved access to appropriate care for people suffering from chronic pain around the world.
À mesure que les coûts médicaux augmentent, les ressources en soins de santé doivent être réparties selon des priorités. Dans ce contexte, le besoin d’établir des repères et d’optimiser les pratiques en matière de gestion des délais temps d’attente se fait plus pressant. En décembre 2005, la Société canadienne de la douleur a formé un groupe de travail pour identifier les critères acceptables au chapitre des temps d’attente pour le traitement de la douleur chronique. Le groupe de travail avait entre autres mandats, celui de procéder à une revue et une enquête systématiques pour connaître les critères, proposés ou en usage, régissant les temps d’attente pour le soulagement de la douleur chronique, à l’échelon national ou international, et à une revue des preuves sur lesquelles ces critères sont fondés. Une revue systématique et approfondie de la littérature et un sondage auprès des présidents de sections de l’Association internationale pour l’étude de la douleur et auprès d’autres importants intervenants ont confirmé qu’il n’existe aucun critère ni aucune directive relativement aux délais d’attente acceptables pour le traitement de la douleur chronique dans le monde. Dans les pays où il existe des directives génériques ou des normes relativement aux temps d’attente qui s’appliquent à toutes les cliniques ambulatoires, on a noté les très grandes difficultés des cliniques de la douleur à respecter les normes établies. D’où l’importance, comme mesure de suivi, de faire en sorte que des recherches plus approfondies soient menées afin d’établir des critères ou des directives internationaux relativement aux temps d’attente acceptables pour le traitement de la douleur chronique. Cela facilitera la défense des intérêts des personnes qui souffrent de douleur chronique partout dans le monde et leur facilitera l’accès à des soins appropriés.
Similar articles
-
A systematic review of the effect of waiting for treatment for chronic pain.Pain. 2008 May;136(1-2):97-116. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.06.018. Epub 2007 Aug 17. Pain. 2008. PMID: 17707589
-
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 39367772 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16959170
-
Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(2):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16;(3):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub3. PMID: 15106156 Updated.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
Cited by
-
Healthcare provider knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes regarding opioids for chronic non-cancer pain in North America prior to the emergence of COVID-19: A systematic review of qualitative research.Can J Pain. 2023 Feb 17;7(1):2156331. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2156331. eCollection 2023. Can J Pain. 2023. PMID: 36874229 Free PMC article. Review.
-
'Treated as a number, not treated as a person': a qualitative exploration of the perceived barriers to effective pain management of patients with chronic pain.BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 12;7(6):e016454. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016454. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28606909 Free PMC article.
-
A model of access combining triage with initial management reduced waiting time for community outpatient services: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.BMC Med. 2018 Oct 19;16(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1170-z. BMC Med. 2018. PMID: 30336784 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The pain imaging revolution: advancing pain into the 21st century.Neuroscientist. 2010 Apr;16(2):171-85. doi: 10.1177/1073858409349902. Neuroscientist. 2010. PMID: 20400714 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Staff perspectives of a model of access and triage for reducing waiting time in ambulatory services: a qualitative study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 3;19(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4123-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 31053118 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bond M, Breivik H, Niv D.Global day against pain, new declaration www.painreliefhumanright.com>20041–4.(Version current at 2006).
-
- McQuay HJ, Moore RA, Eccleston C, Morley S, Williams AC. Systematic review of outpatient services for chronic pain control. Health Technol Assess. 1997;1:i–iv. 1–135. - PubMed
-
- Weir R, Browne GB, Tunks E, Gafni A, Roberts J. A profile of users of specialty pain clinic services: Predictors of use and cost estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:1399–415. - PubMed
-
- Noseworthy TW, Sanmartin C, Conner-Spady B, et al. Towards Establishing Evidence-Based Benchmarks for Acceptable Waiting Times for Joint Replacement Surgery – Report #2, October 2005 <www.wcwl.ca/library/cihr_synthesis_reports/> (Version current at June 15, 2007).
-
- Peng P, Choiniere M, Dion D, et al. Characterization of multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities (MPTF) in Canada: Stop Pain Project-Study II Pain Res Manage 200611121(Abst)
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials