What's driving false discovery rates?
- PMID: 18081243
- PMCID: PMC2810656
- DOI: 10.1021/pr700728t
What's driving false discovery rates?
Abstract
The "Paris Guidelines" have begun the process of standardizing reporting for proteomics. New bioinformatics tools have improved the process for estimating error rates of peptide identifications. This perspective seeks to consider these advances in the context of proteomics' short history. As increasing numbers of proteomics papers come from biologists rather than technologists, developing consensus standards for estimating error will be increasingly necessary. Standardizing this assessment should be welcomed as a reflection of the growing impact of proteomic technologies.
References
-
- Bradshaw RA, Burlingame AL, Carr S, Aebersold R. Reporting protein identification data: the next generation of guidelines. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5(5):787–788. - PubMed
-
- Keller A, Nesvizhskii AI, Kolker E, Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal Chem. 2002;74(20):5383–5392. - PubMed
-
- Moore RE, Young MK, Lee TD. Qscore: an algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2002;13(4):378–386. - PubMed
-
- Elias JE, Gygi SP. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat Methods. 2007;4(3):207–214. - PubMed
-
- Higdon R, Hogan JM, Van Belle G, Kolker E. Randomized sequence databases for tandem mass spectrometry peptide and protein identification. OMICS. 2005;9(4):364–379. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials