Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Dec;55(12):1921-6.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01468.x.

Indwelling device use and antibiotic resistance in nursing homes: identifying a high-risk group

Affiliations

Indwelling device use and antibiotic resistance in nursing homes: identifying a high-risk group

Lona Mody et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify the relationship between indwelling devices (urinary catheters, feeding tubes, and peripherally inserted central catheters) and carriage of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens in nursing home residents.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: Community nursing home in Southeast Michigan.

Participants: Residents with indwelling devices (n=100) and randomly selected control residents (n=100) in 14 nursing homes.

Measurements: Data on age, functional status, and Charlson comorbidity score were collected. Samples were obtained from nares, oropharynx, groin, wounds, perianal area, and enteral feeding tube site. Standard microbiological methods were used to identify methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and ceftazidime-resistant (CTZ-R) gram-negative bacteria (GNB).

Results: Use of indwelling devices was associated with colonization with MRSA at any site (odds ratio (OR)=2.0, P=.04), groin (OR=4.8, P=.006), and perianal area (OR=3.6, P=.01) and CTZ-R GNB at any site (OR=5.6, P=.003). Use of enteral feeding tubes was associated with MRSA colonization in the oropharynx (OR=3.3, P=.02).

Conclusion: Use of indwelling devices is associated with greater colonization with antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. This study serves as an initial step in defining a high-risk group that merits intensive infection control efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Funded by Veterans Education and Research Association of Michigan Pilot Grant, National Institute on Aging Grant K23 AG028943, and an Association of Subspecialty Physicians/American Geriatrics Society T. Franklin Williams Research Scholarship.

References

    1. Strausbaugh LJ, Joseph CL. The burden of infection in long-term care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000;21:674–679. - PubMed
    1. Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW, et al. The efficacy of infection surveillance and infection control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121:182–205. - PubMed
    1. Mody L, McNeil SA, Sun R, et al. Introduction of waterless alcohol based handrub in a long-term care facility. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003;24:165–171. - PubMed
    1. Thompson BL, Dwyer DM, Ussery XT, et al. Handwashing and glove use in a long-term-care facility. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997;18:97–103. - PubMed
    1. Smith PW. Nursing home infection control: A status report. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1998;19:366–369. - PubMed

Publication types