Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Mar;41(3):191-6.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01335.x. Epub 2007 Dec 10.

Efficacy of three rotary NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canals

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy of three rotary NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canals

T Taşdemir et al. Int Endod J. 2008 Mar.

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the ability of three rotary nickel-titanium instruments and hand instrumentation to remove gutta-percha and sealer.

Methodology: Sixty freshly extracted human single-rooted teeth, each with one root canal, were instrumented with K-files and filled using cold lateral compaction of gutta-percha and AH Plus (Dentsply Detrey, Konstanz, Germany) sealer. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 15 specimens each. Removal of gutta-percha was performed with the following devices and techniques: ProTaper, R-Endo, Mtwo and Hedström files. The specimens were rendered transparent and the area of remaining filling material on the root canal wall was measured using a computer image analysis program. Statistical analysis was accomplished by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests with Bonferroni correction for the analysis of residual root filling material and working time.

Results: The ProTaper group had less filling material inside the root canals than the other groups, but a significant difference was found between only the ProTaper and Mtwo groups (P < 0.05). The retreatment time for Mtwo and ProTaper was significantly shorter compared with R-Endo and manual instrumentation with Hedström files (P < 0.001). R-Endo was significantly faster than manual instrumentation (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Under the experimental conditions, ProTaper left significantly less gutta-percha and sealer than Mtwo instruments. Complete removal of materials did not occur with any of the instrument systems investigated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources