Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Nov;13(3):358-63.
doi: 10.1016/0168-8278(91)90081-l.

Duplex Doppler measurements of portal venous flow in normal subjects. Inter- and intra-observer variability

Affiliations

Duplex Doppler measurements of portal venous flow in normal subjects. Inter- and intra-observer variability

P J de Vries et al. J Hepatol. 1991 Nov.

Abstract

We investigated the variability of quantitative duplex Doppler measurements of portal flow. Measurements were validated in vitro using a flow phantom. The measured flow Q (ml/min), is related to the actual phantom output P (ml/min) according to the following formula: Q = 1.08 (P + 44) (r = 0.998). To estimate inter- and intra-observer variance, 38 subjects without portal hypertension were examined in two groups. Two observers examined the first group of subjects (n = 19), from a routine daily ultrasound schedule. Significant differences were found in mean +/- S.D. portal flow (692 +/- 182 ml/min vs. 613 +/- 185 ml/min, p = 0.04) and mean +/- S.D. velocity (15.3 +/- 3.9 cm/s vs. 13.2 +/- 2.6 cm/s, p = 0.01). The combined inter- and intra-observer coefficient of variation (S.D.) was 24% (158 ml/min), 9% (0.92 mm) and 24% (3.4 cm/s) for portal flow, diameter and velocity respectively. Non-systematic components of variance were the largest. Patient characteristics, age, sex, height, weight and body surface area did not influence measurement variations. In the second group of healthy volunteers (n = 19), where variance in measurements over 3 consecutive days was comparable to the combined variance in the first group, the non-systematic variance component was also the largest. We conclude that quantitative duplex Doppler measurements of portal venous flow are mainly subject to non-systematic variability. A coefficient of variation of 24% can be expected in diagnostic measurements in a single patient. Examination by a single observer is advisable. The value of this technique lies in the analysis of pathophysiological mechanisms in portal flow changes in large groups of subjects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources